Search for: "Justice Point Security Technologies" Results 81 - 100 of 2,793
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2021, 11:16 am by Bill Priestap, Holden Triplett
Chief information and security officers (CISOs) will be asked how secure their information technology systems are, and whether anything needs to be done to enhance cyber defenses. [read post]
  Such efforts also include increased investment in technological innovations to solve systemic challenges in preventing and detecting corruption. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 1:54 pm by Bob Ambrogi
So much of significance has happened that I can’t sum it all up in just 10 points. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:15 pm
The Social Security case was just another example of how technology is moving faster than the law. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:53 pm by Michel-Adrien
Itwas chaired by Justice Fran Kiteley of the Ontario Superior Court who is co-chair of the Board of Directors of the Canadian Centre for Court Technology. [read post]
Those points are followed by OCR’s recommendations for using tracking technology in a HIPAA-compliant manner. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:35 pm by Mark Walsh
It will turn out to be technology day at the Supreme Court today. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:26 am by Jim Dempsey
The Department of Justice issued its guidelines for vulnerability disclosure programs (VDPs) in 2017. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 9:37 am by Randy Barnett
Your question raises a broader point, which is the issue of privacy and liberty, on the one hand, versus security and law enforcement on the other. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 6:04 pm by Aaron Mackey
  This footnote is a bit odd, as the bulk of the majority opinion seems to point toward the law requiring someone to defeat technological limitations on access, and throwing shade at criminalizing TOS violations. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Colin Lachance
Understanding law is hard, but following process shouldn’t be So what’s my point? [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Colin Lachance
” Understanding law is hard, but following process shouldn’t be So what’s my point? [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:30 am by Zachary K. Goldman, Samuel Rascoff
Indeed, it appears we are at an inflection point in the debate about the scope of permissible intelligence activities, driven in large measure by the interests of global technology companies. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by Michael Sulmeyer
” (Charley Snyder and I wrote about the Justice Department’s indictment earlier this year of Russian criminals, who evidently had links to the Russian government, for hacking Yahoo.) [read post]