Search for: "Justice v. Justice"
Results 81 - 100
of 88,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 3:11 am
O’Brien v Ministry of Justice (Case C-393/10); [2012] WLR (D) 58 “It was for the member states to define the concept of ‘workers who have an employment contract or an employment relationship’ within the meaning of clause 2.1 of the Framework Agreement on part-time work, provided that this did not lead to arbitrary exclusion from protection offered by Directive 97/81/EC.” WLR Daily, 1st March 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:13 pm
Also Abramski v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:55 am
Regina (King) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2522 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 258 “The discretion of a prison governor to decide the extent of an inmate’s basic association with his fellows did not remove from association its quality as a personal right, a right which was subject to the lawful exercise of discretion by the governor. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:11 am
R (Degainis) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 137 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 24 ”When deciding whether to make an award of damages, under art 5(5) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, for a breach of art 5(4) of the Convention it was necessary to have regard to the provisions of s 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the restrictions placed on such awards. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:04 am
“This court is very concerned about the disparate impact automobile stops have on persons of color and the national statistics on the fatalities suffered by such communities at the hands of police officers,” wrote Justice Cypher in a fractured plurality opinion for the Supreme Judicial Court in Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:21 am
When preparing an excerpt of Schuette v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 10:13 am
As noted in the preceding post, Justice Kennedy was the author of Roper v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 10:00 am
Justice Kennedy’s streak of being in the majority in 5-4 decisions has been snapped today with his dissenting vote (and opinion) in Ali v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:15 am
Why the Court never heard Bush v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:52 pm
In Coker v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:05 am
In HealthBridge Management v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
” I was thinking about the Murphy article, as I read Justice Thomas’s dissent in Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:51 am
The post ALEXANDER & CLEAVER, P.A. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:10 am
Maybe this suggests something about cold-calling v. taking volunteers. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 11:06 am
The NY Times reported yesterday on remarks Justice Thomas made about Citizens United v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:55 am
Last week, as we reported here, it was Bush v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 12:52 pm
In Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 1:12 am
In handling a Bush v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:10 pm
Legal scholar Ilya Somin at the Volokh Conspiracy has authored an interesting and lengthy post critiquing parts of the article. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/10/20/does-justice-thomas-endorse-the-supreme-courts-notorious-decision-inkorematsu-v-united-states/ Respectfully, I think Ilya is wrong. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:54 pm
The topic was Bush v. [read post]