Search for: "KENNEDY V AIR FORCE"
Results 81 - 100
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2015, 4:35 pm
In this respect, the federalism principles at issue here are strikingly similar to those that arose in the Affordable Care Act case of King v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
, the delegation in the Clean Air Act easily passed muster. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:27 am
Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Kennedy joined, dissented (Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:40 am
At issue in the case of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:45 pm
The actual threat to use force is an “assault;” the use of it is a battery, which usually includes an assault. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
See Zerbst v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Ct. 1144: protester broke law by reentering air force base’s designated protest area after being barred from base by commander. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Air Force, maintains a “Top 10 Fugitive List. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:38 am
Justice Kennedy, on behalf of himself Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, and Alito declared that they're supposed to make it up. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:26 pm
The over-the-air TV broadcasting industry’s lawyer, Washington attorney Paul D. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 10:33 am
But the one number that counted: the Environmental Protection Agency seemed close to being able to garner five Justices on its side in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of the Air Force—which held that governmental actions discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation need only satisfy the lowest, most deferential, “rational basis” standard in order to be upheld under the Equal Protection Clause—is still good law. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:01 am
See, City of Santa Monica v. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
In Aamer v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:35 am
Kennedy suggested was “a judgmental component” — that is, one that invited the EPA to use its judgment to achieve the Act’s goal of helping downwind states meet air quality goals. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:15 pm
” The California Supreme Court spoke on this subject in the late 19th century case of Kennedy v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 12:26 pm
The case concerns a suit in which Nike alleges that certain of Already’s athletic shoes infringe Nike’s “Air Force 1” trademark, and Already contends in response that the trademark is invalid. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 12:26 pm
The case concerns a suit in which Nike alleges that certain of Already’s athletic shoes infringe Nike’s “Air Force 1” trademark, and Already contends in response that the trademark is invalid. [read post]
