Search for: "KERR v. ENGLAND" Results 81 - 90 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
This represents 43% of the 371 Crown, magistrates’ and family courts across England and Wales. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Press Gazette had a piece “Why Harry and Megan are better equipped to protect their privacy in England then Canada”. [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…II In Dutton v Bazzi [2021] FCA 1474, Rares and Rangiah JJ of the Federal Court of Australia cited Lord Kerr in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 at [43] who said: …it is wrong to engage in elaborate analysis of a tweet“. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Lots of people frame their problems as © problems; Google v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am by Jack Ballantyne, Olswang LLP
  Lords Hodge, Reed and Kerr are likely to utilise their Scottish and Irish legal backgrounds to address issues of the inter-relationship of national laws and devolved institutions. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  For example, a U.S. provider that stores data in the United States, from the email account of a British citizen located in England, might be simultaneously required (by DRIPA) and forbidden (by ECPA/SCA) to produce the email.[19]  Correspondingly, a U.S. provider that stores email abroad might be simultaneously required (by the SCA) and forbidden (by a foreign data protection law) to produce the email. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am by CMS
This is a live blog of the first day of the hearing of the challenge brought by UK Government Law Officers, the Attorney General and the Advocate General for Scotland, against the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament’s The UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Legal Continuity) (Scotland) Bill. [read post]