Search for: "Kats v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2012, 12:26 pm
the judge stated that there had only been a single use: on the website. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 5:21 am
The interviewer states, "Listeners, what a great V-shaped graph, with the quantity of sales on the x axis and the year on the y axis, with the high points both in 1995 and 2010, and the low point in 2005. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
A common provision in the "Terms of Use" states, to the effect, that "you may access and use the Services solely for your private/personal, non-commercial use. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:05 am
That trade secret protection, as weak or as strong as one views it, is an alternative form of protection for an invention was emphatically recognized by the United States Supreme Court in the 1974 case of Kewanee Oil Co. v Bicron Oil. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 11:37 am
For this reason, he is grateful to Eckhard Ratjen, a member of the Bremen office of Kat friend Boehmert & Boehmert, for discussing, in the firm’s most recent newsletter (and sharing his thoughts with this Kat), the judgment given by the CJEU on February 4, 2016 (Case C‑163/15, Youssef Hassan v Breiding Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH).At issue is a question that has occupied trademark law and practice for many decades: must a trademark license be registered for a… [read post]
6 May 2007, 5:07 pm
".Right: Kat on the prowl. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
The company was found to have violated the state's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.Speaking strictly off the record, the spokesperson expressed regret that WIPO had been slow to comment on the IPKat's posts on this matter, but "this should by no means be misinterpreted as a lack of concern or inaction". [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:53 am
It's Case C-657/11 Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology (BEST) v Bert Peelaers and Visys NV. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 10:00 am
The Court of Appeal handed down its decision yesterday in Hospira v Genentech (with the first instance decision reported by this Kat here). [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:14 pm
A kat-pat goes to Simon Malynicz (3 New Square) for being the first to tell the Kats about this. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
Kats in residence will be Jeremy (in the chair), Eleonora and Laetitia -- with one-time guest Kat Robert too! [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:56 am
This Kat commented in March 2013 on sister blog, IP Finance, about the Samsung challenge to Apple's "cool" factor ("Apple v Samsung: The War over 'Cool'") here. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:31 am
Says the Kat, "well done! [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 3:27 pm
This Kat thanks Sean for his effort. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 am
This Kat is feeling festiveAs temperatures drop and the winter nights draw in, what better way to unwind than catching up on last week's IPKat? [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
The 1709 Blog features a tempting position for a copyright researcher who fancies working in the field of open academic publication, not to mention an analysis bu this Kat of the calculation of damages for copyright infringement in Jason Sheldon v Daybrook House Promotions. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:15 am
Meanwhile, the Kats are pondering on the move of Nils Wahl into the AG's hot seat. [read post]
