Search for: "Katz v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2010, 7:49 pm
Farley criticizes the state supreme court decision in WIREdata, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Co. (1975) 52 Cal.App.3d 429, 436.), a person who makes a complaint to a local bar association of allegedly unethical conduct of an attorney (Katz v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
Katz in a widely read blog entitled Access Copyright v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
The Court said what it meant and meant what is said in CCH v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
As I’ve explained in earlier posts, a “search” under the 4th Amendment violates a reasonable expectation of privacy, and under the Supreme Court’s decision in Katz v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
Ohio 2002) (Katz, J.). [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in… [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 10:35 am
See Allergan Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Pritchard suggested that corporate shareholders propose a fix for what he considers flaws in the Supreme Court's Basic v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Litigation Blog) New Jersey local patent rules (IP Frontline) US Patents – Decisions CAFC applies KSR – finding combination claims obvious: Ball Aerosol v Limited Brands, Bath & Body Works etc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) CAFC rejects lower court’s ob [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Historically, courts have been cautious about encroaching on sacred terrain when interpreting family law; however, the Supreme Court of Canada in Marcovitz v Bruker, (2007 SCC 54), settled this contention. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Historically, courts have been cautious about encroaching on sacred terrain when interpreting family law; however, the Supreme Court of Canada in Marcovitz v Bruker, (2007 SCC 54), settled this contention. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
However, as to that detour, see below concerning “Reference” procedure.This delay and retroactivity is unacceptable by any measure, and the Supreme Court of Canada, at my behest along with Ariel Katz and Prof. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
APPELLATE / IP In Coffee Battle (Folgers v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(IP finance) Global - Patents Study published in Science magazine ‘Promoting Intellectual Discovery: Patents Versus Markets’ concludes free markets superior to patent monopolies (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) Economic woes impact valuations, but not all sectors are suffering (Technology Transfer Tactics) Cancer Institute study show impact of patent age on deal probability (Technology Transfer Tactics) Should management be involved in patenting decisions? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
Jonathan Katz will moderate the discussion. [read post]
