Search for: "Kaufman v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Kornreich, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Ret); Of Counsel, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer and Nelson, P.A. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
In other words, only the State or Council 82 could sue the other for any alleged breach of the contract.* Finally the Appellate Division ruled that LeBlanc's reliance on a claim that the officers are third-party beneficiaries of the contract between the State and Council 82 “is equally misplaced,” citing Lundgren v Kaufman Astoria Studios, 261 AD2d 513. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:33 am by cornellvermontlaw
The Pentagon Papers were, for those who need a refresher, a top-secret study of the United States involvement in Vietnam during the years 1945-1967. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:47 am by Robert Tanha
Altman's receipt by bailiff of October 7, 2008 letter from Kaufman Laramee informing her that she will be terminated if she does not work full-time hours. [read post]
Moreover, in his opinion, these types of lawsuit violated rights guaranteed by the United States and North Carolina constitutions. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in  HOURANEY,  -against- BURTON & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and BERNARD BURTON,08-CV-2688 (CBA)(LB);   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:23 am
Sponsored Topics: Sonia Sotomayor - Politics - Supreme Court of the United States - Jeff Sessions - Republican [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:58 am by Shaun Kaufman
Any extra burglary conviction violated the double jeopardy clause of the Colorado and United States Constitutions. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:59 am by Shaun Kaufman
Any extra burglary conviction violated the double jeopardy clause of the Colorado and United States Constitutions. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm by Gordon Firemark
Meet the new Napster of television Title 17, United States Code, Section 111 (deals with liability of cable television systems and exemptions for hotels, homes, and educators) Righthaven: Righthaven’s Brand of Copyright Trolling | Electronic Frontier Foundation Las Vegas startup sues websites: copyright trolls and the rise of the internet police Barratry and Champerty discussed as defenses in Righthaven case Vernor v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]