Search for: "Kennedy v. Austin"
Results 81 - 100
of 308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 7:40 am
The Court has issued the following written order: “The parties should address the following question: ‘For the disposition of this case, should the Court overrule either or both Austin v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:41 am
Austin, 545 U. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 6:38 pm
Of course, the Court in Austin v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
Four years ago, in a case called Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:47 pm
The Per Curiam Opinion (from the Chief, and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, obviously) in Leal Garcia v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 9:16 pm
The oldest case outstanding is Melenez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
" Austin, supra, at 660. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 2:25 pm
In particular, it may lead to the overruling of Austin v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:04 pm
The quick recap: The case, called Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:47 am
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am
University of Texas at Austin, in which the Court will consider whether the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in college admissions decisions violates the Equal Protection Clause, continues to draw coverage. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Edward Kennedy that he respected the precedent of Roe v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 11:55 pm
’” At the IMLA Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the amicus brief that the State and Local Legal Center filed in Heffernan v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:46 pm
Jonathan Adler summarizes the case: The Court held 5–4 that restrictions on independent corporate expenditures in political campaigns are unconstitutional, overruling Austin v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
Coleman of Austin, Texas, that, when the record actually assembled by Congress is examined, “I don’t understand how you can maintain that things have radically changed. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 11:35 am
University of Texas, Austin II. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:02 am
Earlier coverage of Miller v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:28 am
On the day of my visit, the topic was executive privilege which included discussion of the Presidential Records Act, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:56 pm
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
