Search for: "Kent Barnett"
Results 81 - 100
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am
At the Huffington Post, Mike Sacks interviews Professor Randy Barnett and former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal on the mandate’s constitutionality, and at Bloomberg Amanda J. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 4:14 pm
Jack Balkin, Yale Law School Saul Cornell, Fordham University, History Andrew Kent, Fordham University School of Law Thomas H. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:09 am
After all, as Kent Barnett and I documented in our study of Chevron deference in the circuit courts, there may be “a Chevron Supreme” and “a Chevron Regular. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:18 am
The Metropolitan Police Statement can be found on the Jack of Kent blog. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the decision, commenting that the difference between “the nonretroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:06 pm
Citizens And Southern International Bank, Republic National Bank of Miami, Barnett Bank of South Florida, N. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:26 am
Third Circuit Judge Kent A. [read post]
25 May 2007, 1:49 am
Nancy Boyda, Dennis Moore and Dan Boren (PDF 67 KB) Letter requests for information and assistance in resolving the current passport application backlog 05/24/2007
Letter to Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad from the Congressional Budget Office (PDF 51.3 KB) Letter provides a preliminary review of the Senate amendment in the nature of a substitute to S. 1348, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 05/24/2007
Letter to the Chairman and Ranking Member of… [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
Johnson ProfMEJohnson1 Baltimore Clinical Teaching Robert Knowles ProfKnowles Baltimore Civil Procedure National Security Law Colin Starger ColinStarger Baltimore Nadia Ahmad nadiabahmad Barry Property Environmental Law Corporate Law Loren Mulraine LorenMulraine Belmont Entertainment Law Media Law Intellectual property Jeffrey Usman Prawfish Belmont Máiréad Enright marieadenright Birmingham (UK) Law & Religion… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
Johnson ProfMEJohnson1 Baltimore Clinical Teaching Robert Knowles ProfKnowles Baltimore Civil Procedure National Security Law Colin Starger ColinStarger Baltimore Nadia Ahmad nadiabahmad Barry Property Environmental Law Corporate Law Wes Henricksen Henricksen Barry Torts Health Law Environmental Loren Mulraine LorenMulraine Belmont Entertainment Law Media Law Intellectual property Jeffrey Usman Prawfish Belmont … [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am
Murphy’s Administrative Law And Practice treatise was cited in the following article: Kent Barnett, How the Supreme Court Derailed Formal Rulemaking, 85 GEO. [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:48 am
"It's really to prove their lack of credibility," Barnett said. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
” We published a response to this from Steve Barnett, who called the difference between the two regulators “a chasm, not a cigarette paper”. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am
Kent Scheidegger – The “cause and prejudice” rule is a corollary to the exhaustion rule. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
On the contrary, in a recent study, Kent Barnett, Christina Boyd, and Christopher Walker actually raise the possibility that abandoning Chevron might increase the influence of political ideology in circuit court decisions. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am
Rev. 983 (2016); Kent H. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm
As prolific appointments clause scholar Kent Barnett has pointed out, the Lucia decision was about as narrow as it could be. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Kent Greenfield, Saving the World with Corporate Law? [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:33 pm
This doctrinal difference has been well documented for years, earning the titles of “Chevron Supreme” and “Chevron Regular” by Professors Christopher Walker and Kent Barnett.[1] The Supreme Court rigorously applies the canons of statutory construction, finding ambiguity only when it has truly exhausted those canons. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:54 am
Kent Greenfield, Saving the World with Corporate Law? [read post]
