Search for: "Kent Barnett" Results 81 - 100 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am by Conor McEvily
  At the Huffington Post, Mike Sacks interviews Professor Randy Barnett and former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal on the mandate’s constitutionality, and at Bloomberg Amanda J. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am by Bridget Crawford
Johnson ProfMEJohnson1 Baltimore Clinical Teaching     Robert Knowles ProfKnowles Baltimore Civil Procedure National Security Law   Colin Starger ColinStarger Baltimore       Nadia Ahmad nadiabahmad Barry Property Environmental Law Corporate Law Loren Mulraine LorenMulraine Belmont Entertainment Law Media Law Intellectual property Jeffrey Usman Prawfish Belmont       Máiréad  Enright marieadenright Birmingham (UK) Law & Religion… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm by Bridget Crawford
Johnson ProfMEJohnson1 Baltimore Clinical Teaching     Robert Knowles ProfKnowles Baltimore Civil Procedure National Security Law   Colin Starger ColinStarger Baltimore       Nadia Ahmad nadiabahmad Barry Property Environmental Law Corporate Law Wes Henricksen Henricksen Barry Torts Health Law Environmental Loren Mulraine LorenMulraine Belmont Entertainment Law Media Law Intellectual property Jeffrey Usman Prawfish Belmont      … [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am by Jamie Baker
Murphy’s Administrative Law And Practice treatise was cited in the following article: Kent Barnett, How the Supreme Court Derailed Formal Rulemaking, 85 GEO. [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:48 am
"It's really to prove their lack of credibility," Barnett said. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
” We published a response to this from Steve Barnett, who called the difference between the two regulators “a chasm, not a cigarette paper”. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am by Aaron Tang
  Kent Scheidegger – The “cause and prejudice” rule is a corollary to the exhaustion rule. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:33 pm by Elaine Hou
This doctrinal difference has been well documented for years, earning the titles of “Chevron Supreme” and “Chevron Regular” by Professors Christopher Walker and Kent Barnett.[1] The Supreme Court rigorously applies the canons of statutory construction, finding ambiguity only when it has truly exhausted those canons. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm by Jennifer Mascott
As prolific appointments clause scholar Kent Barnett has pointed out, the Lucia decision was about as narrow as it could be. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:37 am by Guest Author
McKinney’s findings comport with prior research by Professors Kent Barnett and Chris Walker, who have suggested there may be “a Chevron Supreme” and “a Chevron Regular,” meaning that “Chevron deference may not have much of an effect on agency outcomes at the Supreme Court, but … it seems to matter quite a bit in the circuit courts. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Cary Coglianese
On the contrary, in a recent study, Kent Barnett, Christina Boyd, and Christopher Walker actually raise the possibility that abandoning Chevron might increase the influence of political ideology in circuit court decisions. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Kent Greenfield, Saving the World with Corporate Law? [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am by Christopher J. Walker
This year’s committee was chaired by Tim Lytton, and its members were Kent Barnett, Lisa Bressman, Benjamin Eidelson, Sophia Lee, Ronald Levin, and Jed Stiglitz. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:54 am
Kent Greenfield, Saving the World with Corporate Law? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Asay cdasay BYU Richard Ashcroft qmulbioethics Queen Mary London Jonathan Askin jaskin Brooklyn Lisa Austin Lisa_M_Austin Toronto Regina Austin raustin92913 Penn Ian Ayres iayres Yale Barbara Babcock bababcock Stanford Sandra Babcock sandralbabcock Cornell Sam Bagenstos sbagen Michigan Stephen Bainbridge ProfBainbridge UCLA Jeffrey Baker JRBProf Faulkner Jack Balkin jackbalkin Yale David Ball wdavidball Santa Clara Derek Bambauer dbambauer Arizona Jennifer Bankier jbankier Dalhousie John Banzhaf… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am by Bridget Crawford
Glicksman glicksmanr George Washington Jill Goldenziel JillGoldenziel Boston University Eric Goldman ericgoldman Santa Clara Jerry Goldman oyez Chicago-Kent Ryan Goodman rgoodlaw NYU Michele Bratcher Goodwin michelebgoodwin UC Irvine Paul Gowder PaulGowder Iowa Colleen Graffy Colleen_Graffy Pepperdine Kyle Graham kylefgraham Santa Clara Henry T. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Christopher J. Walker
The Role of Stare Decisis In our amicus curiae brief in support of neither party in Loper Bright, Kent Barnett and I largely defended Chevron deference on stare decisis grounds, similar to how five Justices of the Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice, upheld Auer deference in Kisor v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm by Rachael Totz
A decade or so ago, Kent Barnett and I read every federal court of appeals decision that implicated Chevron deference from 2003 through 2013—representing more than 1,500 court-reviewed agency statutory interpretations. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am by INFORRM
The online site also include an article by Professor Steven Barnett, ‘Public Interest: the public decides‘. [read post]