Search for: "King v. Richardson"
Results 81 - 100
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Rev. 56, 63–66 (2015) (suggesting after King v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme Court’s March 1, 2016 ruling in… [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
[FN2] Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
S5 (1990); Straus S, Richardson W, Glasziou P, Haynes R., Evidence-Based Medicine. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:09 pm
ACA litigation, including King v Burwell Self-reporting ACA violations Other topics, including cafeteria plan elections, etc. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded today in Peltier v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:29 pm
The Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury (collectively, the Departments) today (August 11, 2015) jointly released updated information about how the Departments plan to develop rules to implement the data reporting rules needed to implement the transparency provisions of section 1311(e)(3) of the Affordable Care Act with respect to non-Exchange coverage, including health insurance issuers offering group and individual health insurance coverage (non-QHP… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 4:42 am
Associations, Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO-OP) Programs, Stand Alone Dental Plans, Federally-faciliated Marketplace (FFM) Issuers, State Based Marketplaces, SBM Issuers, and Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) issuers should review the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Payment Policy & Financial update on CMS’ policies regarding the administration of the enrollment and payment data reporting requirements of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care… [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
A new disability discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
News & Analysis 10864-10886 (2010).Richardson, Nathan. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
Employer and other sponsors of non-grandfathered group health plans, their insurers, administrators and fiduciaries should adjust the co-payment, deductible and out of pocket limits applicable for the 2015 plan year to reflect the recent adjustment in the out-of-pocket limits on essential benefits allowed by that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) § 1302(c)(1). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
Businesses that did not file required retirement plan returns should contact legal counsel about whether they can come into compliance and avoid painful penalties by taking advantage of a newly announced Internal Revenue Service (IRS) low-cost penalty relief program for IRS penalties and a Department of Labor (DOL) voluntary compliance resolution program for Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) penalties. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Pharmaceutical Pricing Jaime King, University of California Hastings College of the Law, The Burden of Federalism: Challenges to State Attempts at Controlling Prescription Drug Costs Marc Rodwin, Suffolk University Law School, Controlling Pharmaceutical Prices: What the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 2:30 pm
Employers, insurers and other health plan sponsors or issuers (health plans), health care providers, healthcare clearinghouses (covered entities) and their business associates should reevaluate the adequacy of their practices and procedures for the protection of electronic protected health information (ePHI) on or accessible through laptops or other mobile devices in light of the $2.75 million penalty and other schooling the Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (OCR) just… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
U.S. should brace for potentially huge increases in their federal minimum wage overtime costs and liabilities if the U.S. [read post]
