Search for: "Kitchin v. Kitchin" Results 81 - 100 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2012, 1:10 pm
Lord Justice Kitchin explained that he felt reinforced in this conclusion by reference to the German Federal Supreme Court case of Zoladex (Case IZR 87/07) of 29 July 2009. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
 By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:48 am
Today's UKSC decision, led by Lord Kitchin, dramatically upheld his appeal. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:46 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has listed the appeal in the privacy damages case of Gulati v MGN on 20 and 21 October 2015. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:10 am
"While Jacob LJ in Saint Gobain PAM SA v Fusion-Provida Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 177 (Katpost) articulated a test that appeared to be rather general – it must be "more-or-less self-evident that what is being tested ought to work", Floyd LJ has now clarified that this “is far from being a test of universal application”, quoting with approval the warning of Kitchin LJ in Novartis AG v Generics (UK) Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1623 (Katpost)… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
 Mr Justice Arnold is on a bit of a winning streak it seems, as last week in Idenix v Gilead [2016] EWCA 1089 the Court of Appeal consisting of Lord Justices Kitchin (giving the lead judgment), Floyd and Patten upheld his decision back in December 2014 (see Kat Darren's post here). [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:26 am by Brian Cordery
In giving the leading judgment, Kitchin LJ carefully considered Birss J’s analysis of construction (pausing to note that the Supreme Court’s decision in Actavis v Lilly was not relevant), priority, added matter, novelty and obviousness. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am by UKSC Blog
Aisling O’Dwyer, an associate in the IP team and Frances Denney, a trainee patent attorney, comment on the decision of the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Actavis Group PTC EHF and Ors v ICOS Corporation and Anor [2019] UKSC 15. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:09 am by Florian Mueller
But no UK patent ruling has ever been even remotely as controversial as Justice Colin Birss's 2017 holding in Unwired Planet v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:10 am by Dr Stuart Baran
  Instead, Kitchin J had applied too stringent a standard in seeking a confirmed use for the matter of the patent, rather than true plausibility. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 2:42 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal, restoring the order of Kitchin J in the High Court, but declined to make a reference to the CJEU. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:30 am
Mr Justice Kitchin was Knighted in 2005.Previous convictions include Generics (UK) v Daiichi Pharmaceuticals, for those who love SPC cases, and Twentieth Century Fox v Newzbin, where he made some useful comments about authorising, procuring and other copyright infringement 'assists'. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:02 am
 Highlights include:Lambretta v Teddy Smith, where Etherton J in the High Court ruled that there was no design right or copyright in the colourways of a track topJacobson & Sons v Globe GB was a trade mark case relating to the flash on the side of Gola shoes - the registrations were held by Etherton J to be valid and infringedIn Cook Biotech Incorporated v Edwards Lifesciences AG, Etherton LJ in the Court of Appeal gave the leading judgment rejecting the… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
 In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
” Merpel had just read the latest judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the Patents Court, England and Wales, in Resolution Chemicals Limited v H Lundbeck A/S [2013] EWHC 3160 (Pat). [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
This morning Lord Neuberger handed down the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in the Trunki case, PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12. [read post]