Search for: "LEE v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 81 - 100
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2019, 5:58 am
City of Chicago and District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Berle Professor of Law Columbia Law School James D. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Most recently and notably, in 2020, in Kelly v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
: BPAI decision in Ex parte Lacks Industries (WHDA) District Court E D Virginia: Non-practicing entity’s choice of forum not entitled to deference: Adiscov, L.L.C. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (2007) (see denial of rehearing en banc). [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm
“Twenty-three states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, all would have their statutes declared unconstitutional at once. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
First, liberty of the press, at a minimum, meant that a government could not require prior approval for someone to publish a work. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm
At her hearings last summer, she told the committee that she considered the court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm
West and Nicol Turner Lee for a panel discussion. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
Lee, 455 U.S. 252, 261 (1982).) [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm
Chung Min Lee, a senior fellow in Carnegie's Asia Program, will discuss his new book “The Hermit King: The Dangerous Game of Kim Jong Un. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Those arguments are more relevant, and far more prevalent, in non-drug/device cases where the presentation of warnings is not minutely governed by federal law, and unlike prescribing physicians, there are plaintiffs who can’t read English, who have to deal with warnings in workplace settings, or who are just plain knuckleheads in using products. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
Chicago and District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:20 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which spurned a similar challenge in 2018 in a case called PHH Corporation v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
But since both of the family cars had identical government-mandated (allegedly) inadequate warnings about not putting an infant car seat next to an airbag, who gets sued, Minigas – even though it’s car had nothing to do with the accident.Farfetched? [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Canada The Michael Geist blog has an article criticising the Government’s defence of the Online Streaming Act (Bill C-11). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
District Court for the District of Columbia to entertain a challenge to a determination by the U.S. [read post]
