Search for: "LITTLE v. SUPERIOR COURT"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2013, 7:07 am
Here is the opinion in State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:10 pm
The judges and their cases are as follows: Judge Jon Blue: Little v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 6:53 am
Southern Wine and Spirits of Illinois v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
Who do you think is right in this one; the trial court or the Court of Appeal? [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 12:17 pm
Paper the Texas Supreme Court raised the bar a little higher for users of the public streets to recover for injuries resulting from city construction defects. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 12:17 pm
Paper the Texas Supreme Court raised the bar a little higher for users of the public streets to recover for injuries resulting from city construction defects. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:16 am
It was on appeal from a conviction entered by McIsaac J. of the Superior Court, sitting with a jury in 2013, and from the sentence imposed that same year. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:34 am
A new case filed this week in SF Superior Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 9:51 pm
In the matter of Welch v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:01 pm
Just add a tiny little bit of movement (e.g., a downpayment) to a solicitation and, boom, you've got an attempt.P.S. - Don't call Russell Wafer at the Lock, Stock & Barrel in Temple city if you want your sister whacked. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 8:08 am
Hoffstadt, identified as "a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court" -- at least for a little while longer... [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
Hight Jr. in Vance County Superior Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:16 am
It was on appeal from a conviction entered by McIsaac J. of the Superior Court, sitting with a jury in 2013, and from the sentence imposed that same year. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:31 am
Here the Court adopted the common law definition recited in Savoy v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 5:26 am
The case, Piteau v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 5:26 am
Superior Court. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 4:08 pm
Not one, not two, but three judges in San Francisco Superior Court either recused themselves or were asked to step aside by counsel on Wednesday during a hearing in a case over bar exam data. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 12:21 pm
Browne in Kourtesis v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:22 am
But the Court of Appeal correctly notes that the privilege is broader than that, and includes -- pursuant to, inter alia, Section 952 of the Evidence Code -- discussions between others as well.It takes a tiny, tiny bit of a stretch of the statutory language to hold that client-client documents like the ones at issue here may well be privileged, but I think that's nonetheless clearly the right rule.Stylistically, by the way, I think that Justice Epstein went a little overboard… [read post]
