Search for: "LONG v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al" Results 81 - 100 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
United States Department of Health and Human Services Web site. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency, state Department of Health and three environmental groups. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
My name is Tom Galligan and since 2006 it has been my good fortune to serve as the President of Colby-Sawyer College in New London, New Hampshire where I am also a Professor in the Humanities Department. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
  Those who care about health--their personal health, the environment's health, and the health of local economies--must understand that the fate of healthy local food is on the line. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am by Daniel W. Whitney, Esquire
The 10% increase in the state share of the recovery corresponds to a 10% reduction in the federal share.[4]The Fiscal and Policy Note analysis provided an illustration of how a DRA-compliant act would benefit the state:State Fiscal Effect: To the extent that the bill is approved by the Office of the Inspector General at the federal Department of Health and Human Services, DHMH special fund revenues increase under the bill beginning as early as fiscal 2011… [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:43 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition December 2008 OMB Control No. 0910-0626 Expiration Date: 08/31/2011 See additional PRA statements in Section III of this guidance Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Table of Contents Introduction Discussion Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Guidance for Industry Substantiation for Dietary Supplement Claims Made Under Section 403(r) (6) of the Federal… [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm by Shannon Sims
---Community Development ClinicClass Unique #: 28930 Course #: 397C Instructor: Way Et Al. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 9:04 am
Department of Health and Human Services' audits that ultimately confirmed the state-wide billing problems that are the subject of this historic settlement," Koenigsberg said. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
Officials at the highest levels of the Department of Health and Human Services have concluded that certified raw milk poses a serious threat to the public health. [read post]