Search for: "LOUIS VUITTON, INC. "
Results 81 - 100
of 253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
Louis Vuitton, S.A., 766 S.W.2d 377, 378-79 (Tex. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:40 am
Dooney & Bourke, Inc. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:52 am
Louis Vuitton North America, Inc., to avoid further litigation. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm
I’ve written about it from time to time here, including, in December, in connection with the important Second Circuit decision in Louis Vuitton v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:21 pm
See Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:07 pm
District Judge Denise Cote ruled Rosenblatt violated trademark law through the use of the name DeBeers Diamond Syndicate Inc. that rightly belonged to plaintiffs De Beers LV Ltd., a joint venture of De Beers and luxury goods maker LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:53 pm
Australian Gold, Inc.? [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:58 am
This judgment is within the scope of reasoning in Louis Vuitton v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 12:31 pm
These items bore the trademarks of many high-end brands including Coach, Louis Vuitton, Chanel and Tiffany. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 8:39 am
These items bore the trademarks of many high-end brands including Coach, Louis Vuitton, Chanel and Tiffany. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:41 am
I’ve written about it from time to time here, including, in December, in connection with the important Second Circuit decision in Louis Vuitton v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 5:54 pm
The gift cards and gift checks were used to buy numerous luxury items, including tens of thousands of dollars of merchandise from Gucci, Louis Vuitton, Tiffany’s, Neiman Marcus, and other high-end stores. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
Hill, Holliday, Connors, Cosmopulos Inc., 228 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2000) (holding that material issues of fact existed as to whether use of the slogan “Swing Swing Swing,” playing off of the trademarked song title “Sing Sing Sing (with a Swing),” was fair use, notwithstanding holding that the slogan was not used as a mark); Louis Vuitton Malletier v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:26 pm
Marcus Wholesaler Inc. of Pittsburgh and The Paradies Shops Inc. of Atlanta said their federal lawsuit, filed Friday in Pittsburgh, was in response to Louis Vuitton’s claim that the bags violate its exclusive Damier design. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:24 am
ShahNinth Circuit Upholds Web Host's Liability for Counterfeiting Retailers--Louis Vuitton v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
Dooney & Bourke, Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The Court, referring to its 2007 Grand Chamber judgment in Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:56 pm
See Our Related Blog Posts: Wannabe fashionistas painting soles of their shoes to create faux Louboutins Louis Vuitton Sues Over Fake Bag in “The Hangover: Part II” [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 6:11 am
To the extent Pronounce It Right is a reliable and accurate online pronunciation resource, many Americans regularly butcher the “proper” or “correct” pronunciation of many brand names — especially those originating outside the United States, brands such as Porsche, Yves Saint Laurent, Bvlgari, Christian Louboutin, and Louis Vuitton. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:16 am
Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc., the court declared that Warner Brothers did not infringe upon Louis Vuitton's trademarks when it used a knock-off Louis Vuitton bag in "The Hangover: Part II. [read post]
