Search for: "Laird v. Laird" Results 81 - 100 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2012, 6:44 am by Kiran Bhat
C-Span Radio continues its series on historic Supreme Court oral arguments with a look at Laird v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 2:19 pm by Buce
  It was also by several furlongs the loudest rendering of R and J I've ever seen--indeed almost the loudest Shakespeare, saving only some movie scenes in the combat stories like Henry V or Coriolanus. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 10:19 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Laird and (indirectly) in Marbury; a famously slippery opinion by Chief Justice Marshall.1804:  Jefferson is reelected with a large majority in Congress and confirms his party's preeminence.1828:  Jackson wins the Presidency and creates the modern Democratic Party.1830:  Congress enacts the Removal Act to "assist" the Cherokee Nation's departure from Georgia, which is fiercely opposed by a coalition that becomes the Whig Party.1832:  The Supreme Court… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Significant transactions involving foreign investment in Canada’s energy sector that occurred in 2011 include: the acquisition by Petronas (Malaysia) of a 50% interest in Progress Energy’s North Montney, British Columbia natural gas properties;   Korea Investment Corporation’s $251 million acquisition of Hunt Oil Company’s oil and gas properties and its investments in Alberta’s oil sands through shareholdings in OSUM and Laricina;   the… [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:14 am by Danielle Citron
 Questions about the Court’s contemporary recusal practice date back to Chief Justice Rehnquist’s decision to participate in the Laird v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
This is one of a continuing series of articles the blog will publish over the next several weeks, explaining more fully the new federal health care law, and the Supreme Court’s review of the constitutionality of key parts of that law. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:28 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Much of the court’s discussion turns on whether the plaintiffs had shown more than a mere “subjective chill” from the existence of FAA-based surveillance, which would be insufficient under Laird v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:10 am
Police officer’s application for GML §207-c benefits denied for failure to file the application as required by the collective bargaining agreementMatter of Laird v Village of Pelham Manor, 2011 NY Slip Op 01278, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe PBA and the Village of Pelham Manor entered into a collective bargaining agreement that included a procedure to be followied by an police officers seeking disability and other benefits available to him or to her pursuant… [read post]