Search for: "Lamb v State" Results 81 - 100 of 307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am by Oscar Davies and Jack Castle
Oscar Davies, a barrister at Lamb Chambers, and Jack Castle, a barrister at Henderson Chambers, offer their views on the Elan-Cane decision (R (On the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) [2021] UKSC 56) in this piece that first appeared in the New Law Journal. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:17 pm by Mark Bennett
State off-topic: not everything on the net is necessarily true, not … (More as I find them, or in the pingbacks.) [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Lamb v Cotogno (1987): Insured PunishmentKit Barker (University of Queensland, Australia)7. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 2:31 am
Court of  Appeal (Civil Division)   Nichia Corp v Argos Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 741 (19 July 2007) Avis v Turner & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 748 (19 July 2007) AWB (Geneva) SA & Anor v North America Steamships Ltd & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 739 (18 July 2007) Bibi & Ors v Entry Clearance Officer, Dhaka [2007] EWCA Civ 740 (18 July 2007) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kelly & Anor v R. [2007] EWCA… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Given the continuous nature of Breslin's assignment, the light-duty standard set forth in 2 NYCRR 364.3 (b) was properly applied to petitioners' application for disability retirement benefits (see Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Vicks v Hevesi, 45 AD3d at 1038; see also Matter of Lamb v DiNapoli, 128 AD3d at 1321). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am by Laura Sandwell
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:57 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), N.R.S. 50.065(2) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment: (a) A juror shall not testify concerning the effect of anything upon the juror’s or any other juror's... [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:10 am
In Fresno, California, a Superior court judge has issued a tentative ruling in Diocese of San Joaquin v. [read post]