Search for: "Lang v. Lang" Results 81 - 100 of 1,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Für die «Datenschutz Plaudereien» hatte ich das Vergnügen, von Maria Winkler einen Einblick in die Welt der Datenschutzberaterinnen und Datenschutzbeauftragten in der Schweiz zu erhalten.Maria Winkler verfügt als Expertin und Unternehmerin über langjährige Erfahrung mit dem schweizerischen und europäischen Datenschutz- und IT-Recht. [read post]
The judgment is also interesting because it is the first time the court has really focused on the question of interest on past licensing fees (interest on past licensing fees is in issue in InterDigital v Lenovo, but the question of whether it is payable and in what amount was adjourned to a later hearing). [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
These provisions, placed today in Chapter V of the UPCA, include the definition of the patent’s owner prerogatives to prevent the direct and indirect use of the invention (Art. 25 and 26), the list of limitations concerning the scope of patent protection, including inter alia, acts done privately or for experimental purposes, the use of biological material for the purpose of breeding, discovering and developing other plant varieties (Art. 27), the condition of the right for prior use… [read post]
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Guide to EU and UK Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law, Eighth Edition by Sally Shorthose€ 265 The Digital Economy and International Trade: Transnational… [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
In an earlier post I explained the issues that the proposed EU Regulation on SEPs intends to address, and why neither the market nor the courts solve them. [read post]
The only contentions of error the inventor made were issues of claim construction, which he forfeited by not raising them at the appropriate time during the inter partes review proceeding (Driessen v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:22 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
In this regard, in its judgment of 12 December 2013 (case C-493/12, Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences), the CJEU made the following observations: “30. [read post]
It is superfluous for cases such as Ericsson v Apple, costly and lengthy for the litigants, and clogs the court system. [read post]