Search for: "Latham v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2017, 9:43 am
In Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
The case of FLIR Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:00 am
At least as of now, a state-law claim can proceed under the inevitable disclosure theory. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:27 pm
United States, which was consolidated with Overton v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:35 am
In Ambac Assurance Corp. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:04 am
Lobrano, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, January 28, 2017 Tags: Bankruptcy, Bondholders, Debt, Debtor-creditor law, Distressed companies, Foreclosures, Restructurings, Securities regulation, Trust Indenture Act, U.S. federal courts The Spotlight on Boards 2017 Posted by Martin Lipton and Sabastian V. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:08 pm
” In the court’s view, this was strong evidence of a conscious disregard for the employee’s rights, and he would get to trial on his claims under California law (Latham v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:11 am
”Working with NITA’s fictitious “Homestead Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
Ibrahim, William & Mary Law School, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Capital formation, Crowdfunding, Investor protection, IPOs, JOBS Act, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation,Small firms, Tech companies ISS Proposes New 2017 Voting Policies Posted by Lyuba Goltser, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Dual-class stock, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, IPOs,ISS, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting,… [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
At his retirement in 1952, Chief Justice John Latham (himself a deeply conservative figure and former Opposition Leader) declared (in light of the trouble and controversy that the section had caused lawyers and judges alike) that '[w]hen I die, s. 92 will be found written on my heart': (1952) 85 CLR ix. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
Loseman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Saturday, July 30, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fraud-on-the-Market, Halliburton, Merger litigation,Omnicare v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:48 am
In the recent opinion by Vice Chancellor Glasscock, The Williams Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 7:32 pm
” Citing Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:35 am
To discuss the case, we have Jonathan Ellis, who is an Associate at Latham & Watkins. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 10:05 pm
And finally, I've been wondering for a few weeks if John Oliver would weigh in on the Apple v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
The case revolved around a column by Latham entitled “Why left feminists don’t like kids”. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:25 am
Latham v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:39 pm
That’s what the case of Fisher v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:10 am
Latham & Watkins, 238 Cal.App.4th 81 (2015), the California Supreme Court recently announced it will reconsider that decision. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The SLB also touches on the Rule 14a-8(i)(7) litigation playing out in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
