Search for: "Law and Fact Finders"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,373
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2021, 5:17 am
An Illinois divorce judge is the finder of fact during an Illinois divorce trial. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 11:40 am
Cinnamon, a California appellate court applied the same rule we have here in Maryland: the finder of fact can award whatever they want for noneconomic damages, including zero even when it seems preposterous that a person could suffer medical bills and have no pain and suffering. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:38 am
This is because the WCJ is the “ultimate finder of fact. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 2:04 pm
The court held that a reasonable fact finder could infer from the record that the farmers did not believe they owned the land. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:57 am
Before terminating a parent's rights, the fact finder must find, in addition to one of the statutory grounds, that terminating the parent's rights is in the child's best interest. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:00 am
In order to be considered a gang-related offense, there must be a finder of fact that defendant committed the alleged offense for the purpose of promoting, furthering or benefiting the interests of a criminal gang. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:55 am
But in our system the judge or magistrate is at all times either a sole finder of fact or, where assessors are involved, a co-finder of fact. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 11:12 am
A fact finder must take into consideration market forces writ broadly. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Res Ipsa Loquitor is a legal doctrine that applies in some Indiana personal injury cases and allows the fact-finder to make an inference that the defendant was negligent although there is no direct evidence of the defendant’s negligence. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 6:35 am
In most cases, the state will show intent by producing evidence that allows the fact finder to infer the defendants’ state of mind at the time a crime was allegedly committed. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:28 am
In Alleyne, the Court decided by a 7-2 majority that any fact which, if proven, will have the effect of increasing the statutory minimum range to which the accused is subject, must be submitted to the fact finder and proved. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Thus, the Court concluded a fact finder might not legally conclude that jurisdictional requirements were met. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:13 pm
This is especially true when considering a potential fact finder. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:13 pm
This is especially true when considering a potential fact finder. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:13 pm
This is especially true when considering a potential fact finder. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:52 am
Brown the Dallas Court of Appeals held that Texas Practices and Remedies Code Section 41.0105 is a rule of recovery and not a rule of damages and should be applied after the fact finder's determination of damages based on the claimant's reasonable and necessary medical expense affidavits and after other statutory limitations and/or offsets. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:52 am
Brown the Dallas Court of Appeals held that Texas Practices and Remedies Code Section 41.0105 is a rule of recovery and not a rule of damages and should be applied after the fact finder's determination of damages based on the claimant's reasonable and necessary medical expense affidavits and after other statutory limitations and/or offsets. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 8:50 am
In fact, when we asked law firm spokespeople from across Ontario to describe the perfect candidate, we were surprised with the variety in their responses (see our article “Finders & keepers: Recruiting and retaining the best talent”). [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:46 am
The appeals court found that court below improperly acted as a finder of fact on review and imposed its own view of what the bounded “area” should be, rather than reviewing whether the Board’s findings of fact concerning the area were supported by competent evidence and not arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:04 am
“It is the [finder of fact’s] job to draw inferences from the facts, not the witnesses’ job to provide inferences for them. [read post]
