Search for: "Law v. Aetna Life Insurance Company"
Results 81 - 95
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
The appeal court invoked the collateral source rule, which says damages shouldn’t be reduced simply because the victim receives benefits from other sources, such as insurance companies. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:58 am
Finally, in 1997, the court reevaluated the theory in the case, Universal Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:41 am
In the 1995 case, Transport Insurance Company v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
Aetna Life Insurance Company, decided in 1987. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Oct. 3, 1988).ColoradoFarmers Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 5:27 pm
Johnson participated in a group disability policy issued by Unum Life Insurance Company of America.1 In 1999, Johnson applied to Unum for long-term disability benefits. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:29 am
Aetna Life Insurance Company and was decided in 1987. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:18 am
Aetna Life Insurance CompanyLABOR AND EMPLOYMENT - Long-Term Disability Benefits"Aetna was within its discretion to conclude that the applicant failed to satisfy the applicable definition of disability, and terminate her LTD benefits where she asserted only subjective complaints and four independent reviewers concurred that she was capable of sedentary work. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:30 am
Aetna Life Ins. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 10:03 pm
District Judge Faith Hochberg approved a class action settlement that awarded nearly $300,000 to 119 Aetna Insurance Company policyholders who were denied benefits for eating disorders, reports the New Jersey Law Journal. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:14 pm
Code § § 1965, 1969, supra, with Aetna Life Ins. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 11:54 pm
Aetna Life Insurance v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Settlement between Aetna and NY: Aetna developed a doctor ranking system that they represented was based on quality, but really it was based on cost to the insurer. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm
In our recent case of Edward Charles Washington and Travis Parker versus Aetna Life Insurance d/b/a One Canal Place, Schindler Elevator Corporation, Corporate Realty Advisors, and Zurich Insurance Company, Docket Number 01-9541-C of the Civil District Court of the City of New Orleans, all of the issues with respect to the potential modification of the video tape surveillance evidence was presented to us for defending. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
However, whether NOW was denied due process is a matter of law. [read post]
