Search for: "Laws v. Johnson et al" Results 81 - 100 of 638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOWLING, JJ. 2019-09440 (Index No. 502489/14) [*1]Michelle Blackman, respondent, vMetropolitan Transit Authority, et al., defendants, New York City Transit Authority, et al., appellants. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 6:20 am by Charles Sartain
The question with wide-ranging implications for Louisiana operators and mineral owners in Johnson et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright The Evan Law blog has an article summarising Finley v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am by Richard Hunt
Mike Shalabi, et al., CV219466MWFGJSX, 2022 WL 193967, at *6 (C.D. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Russell Wheeler
It alleged a “vast [four state election] conspiracy;” the magistrate judge dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction O’Rourke et al v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am by Richard Hunt
University Partners LLC et al, 2021 WL 5038780 (D. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 10:10 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Nike, Inc., et al., 2:20-cv-09581-FLA (RAOx) [pdf] Related posts: Judge Koh Puts the Kibosh on LinkedIn Referral ID Class Action — Low v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 7:17 am by Unreported Opinions
Administrative lawLaw Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights — Statute of limitations The underlying Baltimore Police Department disciplinary proceedings arise out of a bar fight at a bachelorette party that occurred shortly after midnight at Norma Jean’s nightclub in Baltimore City on August 26, 2018. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 7:14 am by Unreported Opinions
Administrative lawLaw Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights — Statute of limitations The underlying Baltimore Police Department disciplinary proceedings arise out of a bar fight at a bachelorette party that occurred shortly after midnight at Norma Jean’s nightclub in Baltimore City on August 26, 2018. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:52 am by Jon L. Gelman
Additionally, Monsanto admitted that it never conducted any long-term carcinogenicity studies on any of the formulations that it’s sold in the United States.Holding:The Court held that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIRRA) 7 U.S.C. ch. 6 §136 et al. does not preempt state law. [read post]