Search for: "Legal Servicing, LLC v Lewis" Results 81 - 100 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2018, 3:12 pm by Michael Viner
Some of the leading proxy advisory firms, namely the Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis & Co. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This is an issue when the claim definition does not explicitly include subpoenas, as illustrated by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York’s decision in Patriarch Partners, LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The article, penned by lawyers at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, finds it curious that the courts in Madden didn’t resurrect and apply the VALID-WHEN-MADE doctrine, which even the authors admits has a scant grounding in recent caselaw. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
How efficient or burdensome is the counter-notification process for users and service providers? [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm by Daphne Keller
How efficient or burdensome is the counter-notification process for users and service providers? [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:06 am
Posted by Ira Kay, Pay Governance LLC, on Tuesday, June 6, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Capital markets, Executive Compensation, Financial reporting, Firm performance, GAAP, Incentives, ISS, Long-Term value, Management, Pay for performance, Performance measures, Proxy advisors, Shareholder value, TSR The Failure of Federal Incorporation Law: A Public Choice Perspective Posted by Sung Hui Kim, UCLA School of Law,… [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am by Gerald Maatman, Jr.
The dispute over legal fees arose when the employer subsequently secured a fee award for its expenditures in fighting the claims. [read post]