Search for: "Levi Strauss & Co."
Results 81 - 100
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2010, 5:38 am
The case is Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:01 pm
” The case is Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:37 pm
Lion Nathan developed an argument that there was no conduct or act by the registered owner which amounted to use in Australia because a registered owner of a trademark uses the mark in Australia only if it projects the goods into the course of trade in Australia.Use of a trademark"Use" of a trademark must be understood in the context of section 17 which describes a trademark as a sign used, or intended to be used, to "distinguish" the goods of one person from goods of… [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:13 pm
As affirmed by Gummow J in Wingate Marketing Pty Ltd v Levi Strauss & Co[30], “whilst a trade mark remains on goods, it functions as an indicator of the person who attached or authorised the initial use of the mark”. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 8:01 am
Last spring Levi Strauss & Co. cut the number of outside law firms that it uses down to just two — one of the most sweeping reductions yet by a large company. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
The Court referred to the 2006 decision of Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:30 am
Levi Strauss & Co., and concluded that based Rhino had waived any privilege that it may have asserted. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 8:21 am
“Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe is earning a flat fee to handle all of the legal work worldwide for Levi Strauss & Co., other than its brand protection work, the Recorder reports. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 5:10 pm
Police said the purchases were made at City Sports, the Gap and Levi Strauss & Co. at Legacy Place. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 10:30 pm
Also discussed is our work for Levi Strauss & Co. in purchasing 73 outlet stores from the Anchor Blue Retail Group case and for Rackable Systems, Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 11:36 am
Levi Strauss & Co., 104 F.R.D. 103 (S.D.N.Y.1985). [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 7:53 pm
The case cite is Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
Before "retiring" to the nonprofit sector, Flipper worked in private practice with top California law firms, as deputy general counsel for Levi Strauss & Co., as general counsel for The Nature Co. and as a public advocate with the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
Before "retiring" to the nonprofit sector, Flipper worked in private practice with top California law firms, as deputy general counsel for Levi Strauss & Co., as general counsel for The Nature Co. and as a public advocate with the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
Before "retiring" to the nonprofit sector, Flipper worked in private practice with top California law firms, as deputy general counsel for Levi Strauss & Co., as general counsel for The Nature Co. and as a public advocate with the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
Before "retiring" to the nonprofit sector, Flipper worked in private practice with top California law firms, as deputy general counsel for Levi Strauss & Co., as general counsel for The Nature Co. and as a public advocate with the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
Before "retiring" to the nonprofit sector, Flipper worked in private practice with top California law firms, as deputy general counsel for Levi Strauss & Co., as general counsel for The Nature Company and as a public advocate with the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
Before "retiring" to the nonprofit sector, Flipper worked in private practice with top California law firms, as deputy general counsel for Levi Strauss & Co., as general counsel for The Nature Company and as a public advocate with the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:02 am
Levi Strauss & Co., 104 F.R.D. 103, 105 (S.D.N.Y. 1985) and its progeny, concluded that Rhino had waived any privilege it may have asserted.In 2002, Rhino agreed to settlement with the SEC following its investigation into possible securities violations by Rhino. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 2:57 pm
"Edward Lazarus, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld - Native American Rights, Appellate "The pink elephant in the room is Native American gaming. [read post]
