Search for: "Levinson v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2011, 5:27 am
In Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am
,” about the pros and cons of calls for an Article V amendments convention. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
On the state level, formal constitutional change is persistent and ongoing. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:28 pm
The Constitution of the United States, supporters profess, is not really as bad as Levinson would have us believe. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:04 am
Casey v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:04 am
Casey v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:07 am
Here is the opinion: Vindman v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:52 am
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988). [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
To mark this celebration of Sandy’s 40 years at the University of Texas, I want to argue that constitutional faith provides a path back to democracy in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:45 am
In Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
A few days ago, Professor Sandy Levinson argued on this blog that to believe the ERA would pass, one would have to believe Congress has no power to set time limits for amendments and that states cannot rescind their ratifications. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:28 am
” Lawson v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:30 am
Law Offices of Barry Levinson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am
We have started posting the hordes of memos in our “Securities Litigation” Practice Area, but here’s analysis from Skadden: The Supreme Court of the United States today in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
While many critics of the United States Constitution have lamented the extreme difficulty of amending the document because of the hurdles posed by Article V’s rigorous requirements, Sandy Levinson has been prominent and prolific in highlighting how too many scholars today sing the praises of a document that is essentially unfixable and calling into question our almost religious veneration for it. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), and Brnovich v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 10:33 am
At that point Easterbrook noted that the Ninth Circuit, quoting Washington v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
Dukes and Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
