Search for: "Lexmark" Results 81 - 100 of 688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2009, 5:28 am
” Now, neither can Lexmark [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 8:25 pm by Patent Docs
The webinar will review the following issues: • What implications does Lexmark have for patent practice? [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 9:31 am by Nam Kim and Christine Ko
Lexmark’s Implications and Practice Tips At first glance, Lexmark’s holdings are undoubtedly a significant victory for patent holders. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court unsurprisingly rejected that argument in light of Lexmark(which functionally amended the Gordon & Breach test). [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Under Lexmark, a plaintiff must allege that it falls within the zone of interests protected by § 1125(a), which requires injury to “a commercial interest in reputation or sales. [read post]
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) erred by not applying the Supreme Court’s two-part Lexmark test in analyzing standing under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Nov. 3, 2017)A rare case discussing Lexmark’s proximate cause requirement in some detail. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:09 am by Amy Howe
That led Lexmark to sue Impression, alleging that its sales of refurbished cartridges infringe on Lexmark’s patents. [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:58 am by Nick Valentino
The patent owner, Lexmark, sells toner cartridges with microchips that prevent reuse of the cartridge. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Lexmark, a manufacturer of laser printers, holds multiple patents... [read post]