Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 81 - 100
of 45,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
In the 2014 Noel Canning v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
In West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 11:16 am
In REV, LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 7:30 am
Note that McCray v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:50 pm
Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:25 pm
Smith, CLS v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am
Wade, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:46 am
Superior Court in McGee v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:30 am
In a 1983 case called Amusement & Music Operators Ass’n v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:42 am
In any event, this opinion splits down partisan lines, something I’m guessing happens regularly with the NC Supreme Court.) __ The two “liberal” justices dissented. [read post]
28 May 2024, 3:54 am
For some lawyers and experts, the results are in: Freedman Normand Friedland LLP v Cyrulnik, 21-CV-1746 (JGK) (SDNY May 15, 2024). [read post]
27 May 2024, 8:58 pm
I put up a short post on the argument in Smith v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 11:54 am
Here's how this was Friday's Eighth Circuit decision in Ringhofer v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm
I. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
The myth of a “bright line rule” that privacy cannot not attach to public places was judicially debunked long ago (see Stoute v NGN [2024] 1 All ER 818, [36]). [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
A. v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
The 6-3 decision, with the justices divided on ideological lines, means that the disputed district will remain a safe seat for Republicans, who hold a 6-1 advantage in the state’s congressional delegation. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:50 am
Chaclas v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:34 am
In the case of Dayton v. [read post]
