Search for: "Lingo v. Lingo"
Results 81 - 100
of 181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2014, 3:01 am
It certainly is not used in the everyday lingo of a non-lawyer and rarely used by those who are practicing attorneys, but asportation is a term that a New York criminal defense attorney or New York theft lawyer should be keenly aware of. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 4:41 am
A JUDGMENT IN PARR V. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:37 am
None whatsoever.History could now repeat itself in connection with the Apple v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
Also the cowboy lingo is pretty fantastic, and you will come away with hilariously old-timey sounding phrases for very ordinary things, and you will never look at a carrot in quite the same way. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:41 pm
See Cybor Corp. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:42 am
This week’s much-anticipated decision by the First Circuit in Mehanna v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
It certainly is not used in the everyday lingo of a non-lawyer and rarely used by those who are practicing attorneys, but asportation is a term that a New York criminal defense attorney or New York theft lawyer should be keenly aware. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:36 pm
(In polyamorous lingo, our relationship is known as a 'V; I’m the 'hinge' of the V and my two partners are the vertices.)" [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:20 pm
As a prime example of how frustrating this formerly simple task can be, take a look at what happened in the Weiss v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:57 am
Inst. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Apple v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
See State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:03 am
The first challenge (Communication 45 in the lingo) arose out of the grant of planning permission to a Sainsbury’s superstore in Hythe, Kent, and the difficulties which the objectors faced both before and after determination in having their say, both in and out of court – but the complaint ranged far and wide. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am
v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:43 am
The following excerpts are from Bowen v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm
As the Supreme Court stressed in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
BAILII: Recent Decisions Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA [2012] EWCA Civ 838 (19 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Entrust Pension [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:02 am
Here are a few of the phrases mentioned in Maria's post: "In Smith v. [read post]
