Search for: "Little Sisters of the Poor v. Burwell"
Results 81 - 98
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:30 am
This book will focus on Little Sisters of the Poor and California v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:36 am
This term’s decision in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
So the Little Sisters of the Poor were complicit in their employees’ use of birth control if they permitted birth control to be a part of their overall health plan.On the very same reasoning, every time a bishop or a Baptist pastor fails to protect a child from rape or sex abuse in his organization, he is complicit in the abuse. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
And in those environments, more than any others, individuals have little control, and therefore little capacity to mitigate risk. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
-worthy – or, in the lingua seinfeldia, “spongeworthy” – the Court granted and consolidated all seven, which we’ll list here, in approximate order of the petitioner’s meekness: Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:18 am
Others in this symposium have already parsed the Court’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:47 am
Circuit is bound to follow Supreme Court precedent, including 2014’s Burwell v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Pino v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
Hobby Lobby, and an elderly care religious order in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
Following the oral argument in Zubik, the Court directed the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing whether the employees of petitioners with "insured plans" could receive contraceptive coverage "through petitioners’ insurance companies," without requiring the objecting employers to provide either of the forms of "opt out" notice (to the government or to the insurance company) that the current accommodation regulation prescribes. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
In short, no persuasive arguments have been mounted against the disclosure requirement.The non-disclosure advocates strangely echo the Little Sisters of the Poor (in the Zubik v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Another study looking at the effect of the rule in Ghana discovered that because of the reduced access to contraceptive services, the rate of unintended pregnancy increased, as did the abortion rate, among rural and poor populations. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
The exception was broadened again by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Burwell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:04 pm
That, in fact, is the very heart of what the Court did last year in its one fully considered ruling in this series — the decision in Burwell v. [read post]
