Search for: "Little v. Smith"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 7:00 am
That speech is entirely protected under the First Amendment and governing case law, including Brandenburg v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:49 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations about a breach of… [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
Samia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
I admit that I'm no expert in the doctrine in this area, though I do watch it out of the corner of my eye, and I can't recall reading a more ridiculous standing decision in the last 10 years or so than the one the Court endorsed in the 303 Creative v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:35 am
There is much to unpack in the Supreme Court’s decision in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:27 am
Making race-based jury selection decisions in violation of Batson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:13 pm
Its roots are in the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
As often and as loudly as this is repeated, it has gained little legislative traction. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:27 am
After all, who would believe that when ChatGPT tells you that Smith v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 9:26 am
To read the Opinion, here.AIPPI FRAND Rapid(ish) Response - 28 June at 6:00PMThis coming Wednesday, AIPPI UK is hosting a Rapid Response on the IDC v Lenovo and Optis v Apple FRAND decisions of Mr Justice Mellor and Mr Justice Marcus Smith, respectively. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
First, FTC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm
Yet it strikes me that Trump—the man who positioned bigness as a central issue of American politics (“hugely,” “bigly,” “little Marco”)—looks unmistakably small. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm
Back at the hotel, I downloaded the complaint (the TRO motion was filed a little later). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 6:43 am
Finally, in Smith v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 2:15 pm
From O'Rourke v. [read post]
