Search for: "Little v. United Investors Corporation"
Results 81 - 100
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:07 am
First, the approach taken in Canadian Solar stands in sharp contrast to the one taken by the United States Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
Booth v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 9:55 am
Nomination of Directors Last year's AFSCME v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:05 am
.United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
You can read a little more about the background of the suit in the news story you can find here. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
In a prior post I noted the upcoming Second Annual United Nations Forum on Business and Human Rights, of the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, will be held in Geneva 2-4 December 2013. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 9:32 am
” Callaghan v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:09 pm
Part V argues that this failure stems from the inappropriate application of a stockholder-based, normative perspective in the nonprofit sector. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
In 2010 in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am
This could lead investors and researchers alike to think that Google either shut down many of its tax haven subsidiaries or consolidated them into one. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 2:54 pm
The latest issue of Transnational Legal Theory (Hart Publishing) is out.It includes:Transnational Human Rights Litigation and Territorialised Knowledge: Kiobel and the ‘Politics of Space’Philip ListeAbstract: In Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, Dutch and British private corporations were accused of having aided and abetted the violation of the human rights of individuals in Nigeria. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:02 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:01 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:49 am
Yet this economic giant is largely being ignored by Western investors. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:50 am
In Olmstead v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am
Those cases led to Sarbanes-Oxley which included its own whistleblower provisions – provisions which, in our experience, did little to encourage whistleblowers to come forward or to discourage corporate misconduct. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:11 am
In its June 2010 decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
Finally, it also shows that tribunals may pierce the corporate veil of foreign investors in the context of counterclaims.Managing Disputes Through Contract: Evidence from M&A John C. [read post]
