Search for: "Locke v. Davis"
Results 81 - 100
of 181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2015, 2:09 pm
., Petitioner-Appellant, v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
” We were briefly excited when Davis v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Davis asks the now-familiar question whether Miller v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
Davis. 2002.40 McGeorge L. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm
Read or listen to any of this, and you’ll no doubt come away with a sense of outrage that Slahi is still locked up. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm
(Finally) AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) This High Court judgment is remarkable in many ways, most of them worrying. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:07 am
But I think analytical clarity is furthered by splitting these particular locks. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:36 pm
” Warner- Jenkinson Co. v Hilton Davis Chem. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
She persistently checked the locks on her windows and doors at home out of fear for her safety.State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
Ziegler, 474 F.3d 1184 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit) (that defendant could lock his office with a key weighed in favor of finding a reasonable expectation of privacy).U.S. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:30 pm
– Roanoke attorney Josh Johnson of Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore on the firm’s Virginia Construction Law Update McCutcheon v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am
Constructive abandonment is routinely defined as the refusal of one spouse to engage in sexual relations with the other spouse for one or more years, when such refusal is unjustified, willful, and continual, and despite repeated requests for the resumption of sexual relations (see Davis v Davis, 71 AD3d 13 [2d Dept 2009]; Gianis v Gianis, 67 AD3d 963 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am
Constructive abandonment is routinely defined as the refusal of one spouse to engage in sexual relations with the other spouse for one or more years, when such refusal is unjustified, willful, and continual, and despite repeated requests for the resumption of sexual relations (see Davis v Davis, 71 AD3d 13 [2d Dept 2009]; Gianis v Gianis, 67 AD3d 963 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:16 pm
Teamsters Local Union No. 31 as well as other B.C. cases including Davies v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:32 am
ROBERTS v. [read post]