Search for: "Long v. Arnold"
Results 81 - 100
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 10:42 am
” – Arnold Toynbee McCallister v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:46 am
Facts: This case (Sherwood v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:13 am
This would certainly be a record which the Supreme Court would need to reconsider their trilogy of cases which set the cap for damages for pain and suffering back in 1978 (Andrews v Grand and Toy, Teno v Arnold and Thornton v Board of School Trustees) There are deductibles for pain and suffering claims from car accidents in Ontario! [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:25 am
Arnold LJ remarked during the Appeal hearing that “the purpose of sanctions for non-use will be undermined if they can be circumvented by evergreening. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:35 am
The case was decided in the High Court of England at earlier stages by Arnold J in 2009 (L’Oreal SA & Ors v EBay International AG & Ors [2009] EWHC 1094). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:13 pm
The reason is that Long v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
Long-time readers may remember the interesting case of SAS Institute v World Programming (my analysis here), an important software interoperability decision in the UK that got referred to the European Court of Justice. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:56 am
Arnold Arredondo, 2011 IL 111871 (2011). [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
Except, devices that people carry around these days have come a long way from the banana-sized box lawyer Johnny Cochran made famous carrying around in the early-to-mid 1990s. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
That was the opening sentence of Mr Justice Arnold's judgment in Interflora, Inc. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
The Judge followed Birss J’s approach to that question in Pfizer v Hoffmann-La Rochebut as Arnold LJ concluded above, helping a foreign court decide an issue under its own law is not a reason to grant declaratory relief ([63] – [64]). [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
In a rather long decision, the Court made some important and potentially far reaching statements regarding the requirements to prove acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Arnold, III, CFLS [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Sighted this morning, breaking the surface just off the Strand, the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in MedImmune v Novartis [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat) certainly fits the legend.In characteristic style, the judgment is as comprehensive as one would wish. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
LONG. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:48 am
In the Court of Appeal (Hallett LJ, Sullivan LJ, Arnold J) the Claimant’s appeal was dismissed. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:54 am
” In State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
An additional report based on long term study projects is to be issued in 2014. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Given that the Court of Appeal in this case reached its decision in favour of Mr Wood with reference to the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in (Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36), which held (in brief) that business common sense only had a part to play where the meaning of a term is ambiguous, how the Court’s decision in this case aligns with its recent decision in Arnold will be of keen interest to contract lawyers and litigators alike. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:02 pm
(Lara v. [read post]
