Search for: "Long v. Long"
Results 81 - 100
of 73,218
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
I believe that the Supreme Court will decide Smith v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 8:58 pm
I put up a short post on the argument in Smith v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 11:54 am
Here's how this was Friday's Eighth Circuit decision in Ringhofer v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:46 am
In Carl v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:56 am
She noted the Supreme Court’s decision in Groff v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:56 am
She noted the Supreme Court’s decision in Groff v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 10:17 am
US and Oklahoma v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 9:44 am
Centeno v. [read post]
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm
Thibaut Lesseliers, Strasbourg Observers: Föderation der Aleviten Gemeinden in Österreich v. [read post]
25 May 2024, 9:11 am
(Recall I wrote a “long and sad” blog post on the Pace case). [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:40 pm
Israel must refrain from any action in Rafah that risks killing a substantial part of the Palestinian group, either through bombardment or through displacement to areas where they will not long survive. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:12 pm
In addition, from the religious point of view, it is likely that Israel will continue to view the criticism as just another episode in millennia old patterns of dealing with a substantially despised (and sometimes feared) population Whatever the realities, that produces a singularly low level of trust in whatever assurances or performances of (especially critical) States with long histories of unfortunate relations with "their" Jews. [read post]
24 May 2024, 12:39 pm
by Dennis Crouch On May 22, 2024, the day after the Federal Circuit’s en banc LKQ v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
W. v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:38 am
See Smith v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
The myth of a “bright line rule” that privacy cannot not attach to public places was judicially debunked long ago (see Stoute v NGN [2024] 1 All ER 818, [36]). [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:30 am
Wechkin, Sidley Austin LLP, on Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Tags: board appointments, Board of Directors, Delaware law, Demand futility, director appointments, directors, Harrison Metal Capital Proposed DGCL § 122(18), Long-term Investors, and the Hollowing Out of DGCL § 141(a) Posted by Marcel Kahan and Edward Rock (New York University School of Law), on Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Tags: delaware, Delaware law, DGCL, moelis, Quickturn, stockholder agreements The Perils of Governance… [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:30 am
Wechkin, Sidley Austin LLP, on Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Tags: board appointments, Board of Directors, Delaware law, Demand futility, director appointments, directors, Harrison Metal Capital Proposed DGCL § 122(18), Long-term Investors, and the Hollowing Out of DGCL § 141(a) Posted by Marcel Kahan and Edward Rock (New York University School of Law), on Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Tags: delaware, Delaware law, DGCL, moelis, Quickturn, stockholder agreements The Perils of Governance… [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:52 pm
One of the proposed amendment stems from Crispo v. [read post]
