Search for: "Long v. National Football League"
Results 81 - 100
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2015, 3:10 pm
Free agency, with regards to the major sports leagues such as Major League Baseball (MLB), Major League Soccer (MLS), National Basketball Association (NBA), National Football League (NFL), and the National Hockey League (NHL), was not always so free and star players in the early days of professional sports were much more likely to play their entire career with one team. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:10 pm
Free agency, with regards to the major sports leagues such as Major League Baseball (MLB), Major League Soccer (MLS), National Basketball Association (NBA), National Football League (NFL), and the National Hockey League (NHL), was not always so free and star players in the early days of professional sports were much more likely to play their entire career with one team. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 10:42 am
Nat'l League of Prof'l Baseball Clubs, 259 U.S. 200, 207 (1922).[23] Id. at 208-209.[24] Blum, supra note 21.[25] Flood v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
NFL, in which the Court will hear arguments this Term about antitrust violations by the National Football League. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) National Football League v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:40 pm
” That case was Zacchini v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:31 am
NCAA (Art Lien) The National Collegiate Athletic Association and the four major professional sports leagues went to court, arguing that the 2012 law violated PASPA. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
National Enquirer, 123 F.3d 1249 (9th Cir. 1997). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
National Football League, Inc., 11-05209, USDC, Eastern Dist. of Penn.) [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 3:43 am
A spokesperson for the National Football League has sidestepped the issue, saying the league isn’t responsible for management of cheerleaders’ employment. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:25 am
"I don't think the issues in the Porteadores case are all that unique relative to American employers - those issues have long been resolved and whether or not there is liability in one state versus another is dependent upon cross-jurisdictional treaties and recognitions.Policies written for American companies on American soil generally provide for compensation and defense in other states as applicable, so the cross-border issues are largely irrelevant.Likely IMSS doesn't so… [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:01 am
[18] NFL Enter. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:02 pm
National Football League this morning at the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:52 pm
If the Eighth Circuit rules in favor of the league next month, and assuming neither the Eighth Circuit grants an en banc rehearing nor the Supreme Court favorably intervenes on behalf of players, the antitrust litigation path would essentially be punted to 2012 or beyond, when a trial on Brady v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:50 am
and two betting companies were sued for using the English and Scottish football league fixture lists without a licence. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
National Football League, 369 F.3d 124 (5/24/04). [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
In addition, the Court sought the Solicitor General’s views on the potential liability of the National Football League and its member teams for alleged antitrust violations in the marketing of clothing and headwear decorated with team logos and trademarks (American Needle Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
The Defenders Case Study Unlike the Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association leagues, salaries in the NFL are not guaranteed. [15] The likelihood of a career-ending injury is also higher in professional football based on the physical nature of the game. [16] Under the current system, players seek pay days that generate guaranteed money, in the case that a career-ending injury is sustained. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 3:54 am
He is the only federal judge who played in the old United States Football League. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:59 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 10-3270; and The Football Association Premier League Ltd et al v. [read post]
