Search for: "Long v. Unknown"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
June 28 2005); Intelus Corp. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:31 am
Barry Eppley v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 11:57 am
Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:51 am
The post Case Comment:Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2013] UKSC 59 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 5:25 pm
That doesn’t entirely explain the differential response to oil drilling as opposed to nuclear accidents but again the long term unknowns of radiation exposure seem more exotic than the immediate effects of a drilling accident. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note Clarke v… [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
Following Case C-410/11 Pedro Sanchez v Iberia where the ECJ asserted jurisdiction in interpreting the Montreal regime, and given the universally binding effect of the ECJ’s preliminary rulings on Member State courts, I suggested here that a hitherto unknown degree of consistency and predictability in the application of the Montreal Convention might be a possibility on the horizon. [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:51 pm
The New York Court of Appeals’ 2012 opinion in Pappas v Tzolis, decided in the wake and spirit of that court’s rulings the year before in the Centro Empresarial v America Movil and Arfa v Zamir cases, raised the bar for claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty brought by non-controlling shareholders and LLC members in connection with buyout transactions. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 1:48 pm
Whether their intentions are good or bad, it probably won't take long before the U.S. sees its own case of blog v. state. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:08 am
Weinstock As long as she needs Me 144 Marcy, get that dildo to wait another minute, will you? [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:40 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
In State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 6:17 am
(See Prieto v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
One of them, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:05 pm
Unknown (In re Unknown), 2012 U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:07 am
Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:16 am
Balkin continues: On the other hand, if Roe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:42 am
Readers of this blog know that in the summer of 2013, long held beliefs about the required consideration for a restrictive covenant under Illinois law were thrown a curve when the Illinois Appellate Court for the First District (i.e., Cook County) held in Fifield v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:42 am
Readers of this blog know that in the summer of 2013, long held beliefs about the required consideration for a restrictive covenant under Illinois law were thrown a curve when the Illinois Appellate Court for the First District (i.e., Cook County) held in Fifield v. [read post]
