Search for: "Lord, S. v. Lord, C."
Results 81 - 100
of 1,347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
(iv) Lady Hale Gravitating towards a more child-focussed approach, her Ladyship’s judgment struck a more philosophical chord than Lord Carnwath’s mechanical dissection of pure law. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
The House of Lords had previously thought that the scheme was lawful, in R (S) v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police [2004] 1 WLR 2196. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
Global Aerospace v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
In the matter of C (Children), heard 9-10 Oct 2017. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:01 am
Updated, 1/9/10 | R (C) v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2010] WLR (D) 193 – Read judgment When faced with conflicting authorities from the European Court of Human Rights and the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) on the indefinite retention of DNA profiles and fingerprints by the police, the Divisional Court held that they were bound to follow the House of Lords. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
On direct infringement under section 60(1)(c) of the Patents Act, Lord Justice Floyd departed from Arnold J’s subjective intent test which amounted in effect to requiring that the patentee prove that it is the generic’s “wish or desire” to sell some medicine for the patented indication. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
Held: the act of the Lord Advocate in leading and relying at the trial on the evidence was not automatically incompatible with the art 6(1) and (3)(c) right. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
R v M; R v C; R v T, heard 19 Jun 2017. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
Starting on Tuesday 7 February 2012 is the two day hearing in front of a panel of seven (Lady Kerr and Lords Phillips, Walker, Kerr, Brown, Dyson and Wilson) of R (KM) (by his mother and litigation friend JM) v Cambridgeshire County Council. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 1:09 am
Lord Justice Floyd, in his hypothetical answer, saw that the mark had been used in the EU, although only through the later models that were sold.The fifth and sixth points dealt with infringement of the trademarks under Article 9(1)(b) and 5(1)(b), and Articles 9(1)(c) and 5(2). [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am
Bailey & Anor v Angove’s PTY Ltd. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
In the matter of C (Children), heard 9-10 Oct 2017. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
In the matter of C (Children), heard 9-10 Oct 2017. [read post]
8 Aug 2006, 5:25 pm
After all the excitement about Case C-176/03 Commission v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:04 pm
It is well established that this “view” can exist both before and after publication (Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
The appeals in Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v G, Her Majesty’s Advocate v M and Her Majesty’s Advocate v P will be heard over three days commencing on Tuesday 28 June 2011 by Lords Hope, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Clarke (Scotland). [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:31 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
