Search for: "Lord and Walker Publishing "
Results 81 - 95
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
The Courts must not ignore the fact that if newspapers do not publish information which the public are interested in, there will be fewer newspapers published, which will not be in the public interest. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) BBC v HarperCollins, heard 31 August and 1 September 2010 (Morgan J) [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm
This has been published on her “Meeja and Law” blog. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:06 am
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) BBC v HarperCollins, heard 31 August and 1 September 2010 (Morgan J) [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
Listening to the well-rehearsed arguments will be Lords Walker and Collins and Lady Hale.Anti Copying in Design -- better known as ACID -- has just released its latest newsletter. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:18 am
This contrasts strongly with the view expressed by Lord Woolf in the Garry Flitcroft case in 2002, when he said: “The courts must not ignore the fact that if newspapers do not publish information which the public are interested in, there will be fewer newspapers published, which will not be in the public interest. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
In this case, Lord Reid's observations in R v Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd [1973] AC 435 were pertinent: I have said more than once in recent cases that our change of practice in no longer regarding previous decisions of this House as absolutely binding does not mean that whenever we think that a previous decision was wrong we should reverse it. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
In this case, Lord Reid's observations in R v Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd [1973] AC 435 were pertinent: I have said more than once in recent cases that our change of practice in no longer regarding previous decisions of this House as absolutely binding does not mean that whenever we think that a previous decision was wrong we should reverse it. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:28 pm
Race on Trial: Black Defendants in Ontario’s Criminal Courts, 1850-1950 by Barrington Walker and published for the Osgoode Society by the University of Toronto Press. $40 incl GST. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am
The Supreme Court has, belatedly, posted the “Case Details” for this case, which show that the proposed bench for the hearing is Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown, with Sir John Dyson as the fifth member of the court. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
Lord Walker is careful to avoid saying anything. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 9:51 am
Lawyers at the High Court in Edinburgh told the judge, Lord Menzies, that they were still wading through "a room full" of documents held at an Aberdeen police station. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 6:39 am
I am fighting for the Lord ... [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
Kerik ruled like a feudal lord, many former employees have said. [read post]
