Search for: "Lord v. Collins"
Results 81 - 100
of 220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
– Irony Is For FuckersThe Owls – Isaac Bashevis SingerBoardroom Heroes – IshmaelBilly Koumantzelis – Jack Kerouac’s Morning Beer ShotManic Street Preachers – Jackie Collins Existential Question TimeAimee Mann – Jacob Marley's ChainPernice Brothers – Jacqueline SusannWilliam Parker – James Baldwin To The RescueSteve Hackett – Jane Austen's DoorRon Sexsmith – Jazz At The BookstoreNoah And The Whale –… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
– Irony Is For FuckersThe Owls – Isaac Bashevis SingerBoardroom Heroes – IshmaelBilly Koumantzelis – Jack Kerouac’s Morning Beer ShotManic Street Preachers – Jackie Collins Existential Question TimeAimee Mann – Jacob Marley's ChainPernice Brothers – Jacqueline SusannWilliam Parker – James Baldwin To The RescueSteve Hackett – Jane Austen's DoorRon Sexsmith – Jazz At The BookstoreNoah And The Whale –… [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 2:41 am
For Lords Collins and Sumption, the reality was that the whole transaction was indivisible, and this could be shown by an analysis of the Law Society's standard conveyancing practice. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
However, the justices did discuss it, with a notable point arising in that Lord Collins and Lord Sumption agreed that the contract, as well as the conveyance and the mortgage, were all part of the same transaction, whilst Lady Hale, Lord Wilson and Lord Reed disagreed that the contract was part of the indivisible transaction. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Lord Collins also ruled in favour of the appellant, noting that he was “struck by the chilling effect on the exercise of lawful rights such a deployment would have. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Lord Collins also ruled in favour of the appellant, noting that he was “struck by the chilling effect on the exercise of lawful rights such a deployment would have. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Collins, “A Considerable Surgical Operation”: Article III, Equity, and Judge-Made Law in the Federal Courts, Duke Law Journal 60(2):249-343 (2010). [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm
To cut a long judgment short, Collins J rehearses all the relevant authorities on this topic, and concludes that the test in X v UK, and accordingly in the Guidance, is too high. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm
The FTT went on to say: The House of Lords Uratemp v Collins [sic] (albeit in a context of different legislation) held that the usage of a room defines what it is and that this depended on the facts at the time the decision was made. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm
The FTT went on to say: The House of Lords Uratemp v Collins [sic] (albeit in a context of different legislation) held that the usage of a room defines what it is and that this depended on the facts at the time the decision was made. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:08 pm
Count Tolstoy-Miloslavsky v Lord Aldington [1996] 2 All 556, Rose, Roch and Ward LJJ dismissed an appeal by Schilling and Lom against an order by Collins J that they should pay 60% of the defendant’s costs. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
Lord Coke’s definition is, ”an institution by the king, by his grant, commission, or otherwise, to any persons or corporations, of or for the sole buying, selling, making, working or using of every thing, whereby any persons or corporations are sought to be restrained of any freedom or liberty they had before, or hindered in their… [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:04 pm
This legislative history is narrated in DPP v Collins (para 6), a very interesting decision on s 127, involving a man who made repeated telephone to his local MP's office asking for him to do something about the "black bastards" - or similar terms. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) has been allowed. [read post]
