Search for: "Louisiana v. Davis" Results 81 - 100 of 279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Charles Sartain
Judge Davis based the majority opinion on the Jones Act and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miles v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:55 pm by WIMS
District Judge Martin Feldman, for the Eastern District of Louisiana in New Orleans issued an opinion and order lifting the moratorium on deepwater offshore drilling (Hornbeck v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
” [John Kenneth Ross, IJ “Short Circuit” on Davis v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
Louisiana Photo Identification Requirement for In-Person Voting: Crawford v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
App’x 364, 366–67 (9th Cir. 2018) (considering personal contacts between the appellant and state of Washington to find personal jurisdiction to enforce a foreign arbitral award); S & Davis Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Opinion below (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-54 Title: Department of the Interior et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
I’m delighted to say that Robert Corn-Revere, Ronald London, and Lisa Beth Zycherman (all of Davis Wright Tremaine) and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of Mary Beth Tinker and John Tinker supporting the petition for certiorari in Dariano v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:50 am by Mary L. Dudziak
  Legal history-related panels include:ThursdayConfiguring the Cold War: Constructive Courtroom Narratives in Dennis et al v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Davis, announced that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause protected only against provably intentional race discrimination; and Cruikshank, not the Civil Rights Cases or City of Boerne v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
Bd. of Educ., 777 F.2d 1403, 1410 (10th Cir. 1985); Davis v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:30 am by Howard Friedman
It also rejected his religious freedom claims based on occasional failures of his meal trays to include all items that should have been on the religious diet tray.In Davis v. [read post]