Search for: "Loving v. Alexander" Results 81 - 100 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
’” In The New York Times, Manohla Dargis reviews “Loving,” a movie about the interracial couple at the center of the landmark civil rights case Loving v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:19 am
 - Stuart JacksonAlice Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
 A couple of weeks ago, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting in theHigh Court) handed down his decision in Glaxo v Sandoz [2016] EWHC 1537 in which he was asked by Sandoz to determine, on a summary judgment application, whether Glaxo's EU Trade Mark No 3890126 was invalid. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:12 am
The Hollywood Review reviews the new film Loving, which dramatizes the case of Loving v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:15 am by Cookson Beecher
Woloszyn said the two vibrios (V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii)  are major causes of larval shellfish mortality, which results in increased costs to the aquaculture industry and consumer. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am by Ben
Back in 2004, Californian state senator Kevin Murray wrote this in a report in US recording industry practices:“Much like the public generally dislikes politicians, but love their individual representatives, Artists have respect for their record company handlers, but distrust the companies themselves and the system they operate under. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Defamation set 5RB has announced that its senior clerk, Kim Janes, will retire at the end of February 2016 after 25 years in post and will be replaced by Andrew Love. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
  The reason is simple:  doctors love faxes, and pharmacies love them too. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 1:43 pm
(The caption lists him as “a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Supreme Court’s pronouncement that interracial marriage bans are unconstitutional in Loving v. [read post]