Search for: "Lowery v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2009, 9:47 am
Answer: You have to pay the State for the foster care. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 5:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
The plaintiffs, on the other hand, rely on the Lowery v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:30 am
The Galstaldi court citing Lowery v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:25 am
Lowery v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
The court followed the Eleventh Circuit’s holding in Lowery v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:17 am
(quoting Lowery v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:52 pm
Yates v Yates, 259 Ga. 131, Moore v Moore, 249 Ga. 27 (1982), Lowery v Lowery, 262 Ga 20 (1992), and Peters v Peters, 248 Ga. 4980 (1981). [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 12:30 pm
Co., 505 F.3d 401, 404-05 (6th Cir. 2007) (Editors’ Note: See the CAFA Law Blog analysis of Smith posted on July 7, 2008); Lowery v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:11 pm
New Jersey, 07-1562). ** An appeal asking the Court to clarify the right of public school students to speak out publicly against a teacher they believe mistreats of abuses students (Lowery v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 6:15 am
Louisiana Issue: Whether the Sixth Amendment, as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, allows criminal convictions based on non-unanimous jury verdicts.And this one shows how times have changed:Case name: Lowery, et al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
However, the court pointed to a 2007 opinion – Lowery v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Evaluating the plaintiff’s motion to remand, the district court looked to Lowery v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 6:54 am
In Siniard v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:45 am
Katie Lowery, et al. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Sanders,Commentary, See No Removal, Hear no Removal: The 11th Circuit’s New Posture on Removal in Lowery v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 7:23 pm
Lowery v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of the State's motion for clarification and REMAND with instructions that the district court grant the State's motion for clarification consistent with this opinion. 07a0294p.06 2007/08/03 Williams v. [read post]
