Search for: "MAPP v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 199
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2014, 9:34 am
Mapp.The 4th Amendment violation, applicable to the states through the 14th Amendment, required exclusion of the evidence, the Supreme Court said in 1961. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
And said, in Mapp v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 11:05 am
Absent the case of Mapp v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
The defendant relies upon the case of State of Columbia v Heller. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:35 pm
The defendant denied drinking alcohol to the police officer but stated that the passengers were drinking. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:45 pm
(Mapp v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
He obviously has a perspective of his own on the underlying issues — he was, for instance, a forceful critic of the Court’s Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 6:13 am
Canonical cases like Mapp v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:34 am
Canonical cases like Mapp v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 12:47 pm
The Court’s single most important exclusionary rule decision was probably Mapp v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 8:56 pm
In a recent case known as People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Fordyce v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:30 am
One, the impetus for formalizing police stops arose midst confusion generated by Mapp v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:27 pm
A Mapp hearing was held on 9 September 2009, during which only MM testified. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:06 pm
Consider then an alternate take: (Full size image) The primary difference in this second version is Mapp v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:36 pm
On the consent of the People and pursuant to People v Dunaway, Mapp v Ohio and People v Huntley, a hearing was held in this matter on 19 October 2012. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:25 pm
On 26 July 2007, a Mapp-Huntley was held before this court. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:46 am
Further, the recent Court cases of United States v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:31 am
For instance, his opinion in Mapp v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 8:44 am
Dunaway, 442 US 200, 99 S Ct 2248, 60 L Ed2d 824 (1979) and Mapp v. [read post]
