Search for: "MAPP v. UNITED STATES"
Results 81 - 100
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 9:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm
United States, a well watched case that had raised the question as to whether the exclusionary rule should apply in situations where the police have relied in good faith on law that was later overturned. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am
Plata and Citizens United v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
— Tucker says: I told him about Mapp vs. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
The Court extended that Amendment, and with it, the exclusionary rule, to state and local governments in the 1961 case of Mapp v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:20 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:33 am
It wasn't until 1961, in Mapp v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:04 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:07 am
United States and Mapp v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 am
United States, and Terry v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 9:04 pm
This is the train of citations (Sidhom is not pertinent): Thomas (2002): The defendant, however, bears the ultimate burden of proving, by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that the evidence should not be used against him (see, People v Berrios, supra at 367; People v Baldwin, 25 NY2d 66, 70; People v Whitehurst, 25 NY2d 389, 391; Nardone v United States, 308 US 338, 341-342), and that the police lacked probable cause to arrest him (see,… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
Is the Constitution of the United States a uniquely American document, defined with reference to American history and ideals, or is it a port for courts to plug into some universal Cosmic Consciousness and set the American people straight when we, in our ignorance, stray too far from what the judges know the world knows is right? [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 12:21 pm
Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 466 (1966); Mapp v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:19 pm
Callahan and United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm
(He was not a fan of the blanket policy, at least not in that case, but in Mapp v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm
Arizona and Mapp v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
United States, — U.S. [read post]
