Search for: "MARK R. SUITS" Results 81 - 100 of 4,206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2010, 4:34 am by Stefanie Levine
Me:  Some experts believe the suits are a temporary wave that will fade once corporations stop engaging in false patent marking, do you agree? [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:18 pm
In August, I commented on the wrongful death suit that the Bavis family was bringing on behalf of Mark Bavis, who died as a result of the September 11th tragedy. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 8:03 am by kanhaiyalal
The acquired product suite, recently rebranded CloudNine LAW, CloudNine Concordance®, CloudNine Explore (formerly Early...Read the whole entry... [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 4:44 pm
But Mark LaPerna, founder of a gay porn site, just got a copyright infringement suit from porn producer Titan Media transferred to Las Vegas without a lawyer and without even filing a motion to transfer. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:44 am
Practice Tip: This case has been brought qui tam, meaning GHJ has initiated the suit but it is the United States government who has been injured. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA ___________________________________ REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT __________________________________ MARK S. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 9:32 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, asking the Court to review a July 2020 panel decision relating to its interpretation of the patent marking statute, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 3:14 am
The record shows that petitioner itself offers a "suite" under the mark DEVONSHIRE; the "suite" encompasses toilets and lavatories, as well as shower doors, faucets, and bath accessories. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:32 am by Jody Coultas
Following a suit filed by the owner of the KROMA mark against the Kardashians and a beauty product manufacturer for infringement, Kroma also filed suit for infringement. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 7:20 am
Mark Lemley, Stanford (with John R. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:37 pm
The suit was removed to Federal Court for the Southern District of California in June 2007, marking the beginning of a discovery period rife with evasion that ultimately led to sanctions under FRCP Rules 26 and 37. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 6:01 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Daily Business Review] * Pain at the pump apparently extends to this gas giant’s résumé dumps. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:24 pm by Jason Rantanen
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560–61 (1992), which denied plaintiffs standing under a citizen-suit provision, as relating only to suits against the government itself. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 2:15 am by Steve Brachmann
The suit, filed in the Central District of California, alleges that Smashburger has recently adopted certain promotional advertising marks which infringe upon both state and federal trademarks held by In-N-Out. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:15 am by Nancy Braman
(Ready for the World) against Melvin Riley, John Eaton, Daniel Dillman, Renee Atkins, and Jan Mark Land. [read post]