Search for: "MARKS v. DIXON"
Results 81 - 100
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Mackey Davenport v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Dixon, 10-1540, which the state also claims disregarded various Supreme Court precedents. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:46 pm
By Stefan Passantino & Ben Keane It has been almost exactly 19 months since the Supreme Court handed down its controversial decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:47 am
The Supreme Court of Canada recently released its decision in the case of Masterpiece v Alvida which clarified some trade-mark issues, particularly on the issue of confusion. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Fell Kennedy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Viewing the Defamation of Religions Debate Through Otto-Preminger-Institut v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:16 am
" Halley v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
Given the the same phrase – “in principle” – is used in the same context in Cosic (at [22], as quoted above), I don’t see that its use in Kay marks any departure of the Court from previous, erm, principle. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
This judgment sets the clock back to the days of Dixon of Dock Green. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
However, Mr H also argued the recent run of ECtHR case law (Cosi v Croatia Application 28261/06, Paulic v Croatia Application 3572/06 [links to our reports]) and that this marked a move beyond the House of Lords decision in Harrow LBC v Qazi (2004) 1 AC 983, such that it was seriously arguable that the rule was incompatible despite Qazi. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
However, Mr H also argued the recent run of ECtHR case law (Cosi v Croatia Application 28261/06, Paulic v Croatia Application 3572/06 [links to our reports]) and that this marked a move beyond the House of Lords decision in Harrow LBC v Qazi (2004) 1 AC 983, such that it was seriously arguable that the rule was incompatible despite Qazi. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 12:22 am
For more serious allegations for example where there are damaging allegations of dishonesty, the Courts may be relectant to exercise this abuse jurisdiction, even where the extent of publication is limited since it deprives the claimant of the opportunity to vindicate his reputation see for example the decision of Mrs Justice Sharp in Stelios Haji-Ioannou v Mark Dixon [2009] EWHC 178 (QB. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:50 am
Ada Liss Group (2003) v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
To say that is not to gainsay the point made by Dixon CJ in Mark Foy’s Ltd v Davies Coop and Co Ltd (1956) 95 CLR 190 at 194–5 (the Tub Happy case), that language is not always used to convey a single, clear idea; a mark may have a descriptive element but still serve as a badge of trade origin. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:21 am
These case summaries were provided courtesy of Mark Friedman of the New Jersey State Office of the Public Defender. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 2:08 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Austin v London Borough of Southwark [2009] EWCA Civ 66 (16 February 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Haji-Ioannou v Mark Dixon Regus Group Plc & Anor [2009] EWHC 178 (QB) (06 February 2009) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) OSC Building Services Ltd v Interior Dimensions Contracts Ltd [2009] EWHC 248 (TCC) (08 January [...] [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:16 pm
While not specifically addressing the same fact pattern, Judge Posner's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
