Search for: "MATTER OF A J S" Results 81 - 100 of 21,822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am by Benson Varghese
The prosecution’s duty to disclose was restricted to what was directly asked for and proven to be necessary by the defense. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am by Benson Varghese
The prosecution’s duty to disclose was restricted to what was directly asked for and proven to be necessary by the defense. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am by Benson Varghese
The prosecution’s duty to disclose was restricted to what was directly asked for and proven to be necessary by the defense. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
In fact, a recent study found that the fine particulate matter that spewed from California’s wildfires between 2008 and 2018 was responsible for as many as 55,700 premature deaths in the state. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Court of Appeal:[5] By a 2:1 majority, the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against Jacobs Js judgment. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The High Court held that the claimant had no real prospect of establishing that the reviews caused, or were likely to cause, serious reputational harm, either as a matter of fact or by inference. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:25 am by Yosi Yahoudai
The post 2024 Ford Ranger: one year older, better appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 3:02 am by Yosi Yahoudai
The post Sac Metro Fire wants people to put safety first when lighting fireworks this summer appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 1:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
– Feb. 27: William pulls out of a memorial service for his godfather, King Constantine of Greece, due to a “personal matter. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 8:20 am by INFORRM
The African System Factsheet was prepared by CGFoE’s Legal and Program Consultant Anderson J. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's claims against his union, Professional Staff Congress (PSC-CUNY), and its legal director, arising from their selection of an allegedly biased arbitrator are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel based on this Court's resolution of that issue in plaintiff's prior appeals (see Matter of Dowlah v City Univ. of N.Y., 189 AD3d 533, 534 [1st Dept 2020]; Dowlah v American Arbitration Assn., 221 AD3d 426, 426 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's claims against his union, Professional Staff Congress (PSC-CUNY), and its legal director, arising from their selection of an allegedly biased arbitrator are barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel based on this Court's resolution of that issue in plaintiff's prior appeals (see Matter of Dowlah v City Univ. of N.Y., 189 AD3d 533, 534 [1st Dept 2020]; Dowlah v American Arbitration Assn., 221 AD3d 426, 426 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 4:39 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
The city attorney’s office has dual roles, representing the city in a wide array of legal matters while also prosecuting misdemeanor crimes. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Wednesday’s vote was met with wary optimism by advocates from Push L.A. coalition — which includes the Community Coalition, Catalyst California and Black Lives Matter Los Angeles — who said it was a long-awaited moment. [read post]
  The Court vacated the injunction and remanded the matter, holding that nothing in the text of the Act indicates that Section 10(j) injunctions should be analyzed under a lower standard. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"[W]here there is a conflict in the testimony and either of two inferences may be drawn, the duty of choosing between the inferences is the agency's, and the courts may not reject the agency's choice" (Matter of Fields v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 198 AD3d 454, 455 [1st Dept 2021]). [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"[W]here there is a conflict in the testimony and either of two inferences may be drawn, the duty of choosing between the inferences is the agency's, and the courts may not reject the agency's choice" (Matter of Fields v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 198 AD3d 454, 455 [1st Dept 2021]). [read post]