Search for: "MATTER OF B H D H JR" Results 81 - 100 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2011, 10:56 am by maureen
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURETo ensure compliance with requirements imposed by = the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax = advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), = unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be = used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties = under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or = recommending to another party any matters addressed = herein. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:48 am by maureen
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURETo ensure compliance with requirements imposed by = the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax = advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), = unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be = used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties = under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or = recommending to another party any matters addressed = herein. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:10 am by maureen
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURETo ensure compliance with requirements imposed by = the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax = advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), = unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be = used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties = under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or = recommending to another party any matters addressed = herein. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 7:49 pm by cdw
Stuard, supra, I believe the evidence establishes that the present matter was handled in a similar manner as that of his co-defendant. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 12:37 pm by admin
” In order to be considered a Domestic Support Obligation not dischargeable in bankruptcy, the support obligation must meet the four requirements found in (A), (B), (C), and (D) above. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 1:39 pm by jameswilson29@gmail.com
” In order to be considered a Domestic Support Obligation not dischargeable in bankruptcy, the support obligation must meet the four requirements found in (A), (B), (C), and (D) above. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 7:50 am by Simon Chester
Granat and Stephanie Kimbro Chapter 8: Large Law Firms: A Business Model, a Service Ethic – Carolyn B. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:44 am by Ben
Smith, Jr and Judge Mary H Murguia) held that “Got To Give It Up” was entitled to broad copyright protection because musical compositions are not confined to a narrow range of expression. [read post]