Search for: "MATTER OF D D V"
Results 81 - 100
of 22,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2020, 5:09 am
(D. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 9:43 am
Inadmissibility Series I: INA 212(a)(2)(D)(i) Prostitution Inadmissibility Series INA 212– Part V 212(a)(2)(D)(i) Section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 lists a series of classes of foreign nationals who are inadmissible to the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:36 am
Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB); [2008] WLR (D); [2008] WLR (D) 259 “Sado-masochistic behaviour, even where it involved adultery, was not a matter of genuine public interest justifying interference by the media in an individual's private life. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 11:45 am
Salazar (D. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 11:45 am
Salazar (D. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 10:17 am
The case is Defense Distributed v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 10:52 am
LG was a good decision as a matter of law. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:34 am
Pitt and another v Holt and another; Futter and another v Futter and Others [2011] EWCA Civ 197; [2011] WLR (D) 84 “Where trustees, acting within their powers, carried out a transaction which was said to be vitiated by breach of trust on the ground that the trustees failed to have regard to a relevant matter, and where the reason that they did not have regard to it was that they had obtained and acted on advice from apparently competent advisers which turned… [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 6:28 am
RICHARD CONVERSE d/b/a DC TAX SERVICE, INC., Respondents and Appellants. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:52 am
Regina v Knaggs [2009] EWCA Crim 1363; [2009] WLR (D) 239 “A defendant who had pleaded guilty to an offence without any challenge to the facts by way of a Newton hearing was not thereby debarred, as a matter of law, from challenging the prosecution evidence for the purposes of a confiscation hearing. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0035, 2009 MT 418, TIM GIACOMELLI, DON HAMILTON, YELLOWSTONE HORSE RACING ALLIANCE, INC., and YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, METRAPARK, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 7:01 am
Williams (D. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:24 am
Neilly v The Queen [2012] UKPC 12; [2012] WLR (D) 144 “When a defendant in a criminal trial had not been put on an identification parade, the decision as to whether to allow a dock identification was a matter for the trial judge in the light of all the relevant circumstances. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:21 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:54 pm
However, because Prop D was a municipal initiative on a wholly municipal matter, it was properly enacted without a planning commission hearing. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:35 am
In Hernandez v Ochoa, 2017 WL 3575487 (D. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 7:29 am
(See: OZ Minerals Holdings Pty Ltd. v AIG Australia Ltd.) [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:43 pm
Missouri V. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:52 am
Regina v Armstrong [2012] EWCA Crim 83; [2012] WLR (D) 22 “If in the military courts a judge did not approve of a course that a military prosecutor intended to take the proper course for the judge was to ask for the matter to be referred either to the Director of Service Prosecutions or to the Attorney General, as might be appropriate.” WLR Daily, 1st February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 1:37 am
Jayasinghe v Liyanage [2010] EWHC 265 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 44 “The adjudicator to the Land Registry had jurisdiction to conduct a trial of the question of beneficial entitlement to property where an objection to an application was made to the registrar and the matter referred to the adjudicator under s 73(7) of the Land Registration Act 2002. [read post]
