Search for: "MATTER OF D V"
Results 81 - 100
of 22,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:52 am
It may not even matter whether you actually communicated with your competitors. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am
The efficient markets hypothesis is over 50 years old.Basic v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) in 2019, due to the matter being time-barred, Ms. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:45 am
I've drafted some language I'd be happy for you to add to your opinion. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Since most – if not all – of the important developments with respect to civil and commercial matters[8]in this area were achieved within the framework of EU Private International Law (PIL) (e.g. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Case 1: Baldessari Trust v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm
These are core tenets of the accounting profession.[4] Why Does Tone at the Top Matter for Public Accounting Firms? [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm
Cantwell (D-WA), who chairs the Senate commerce committee. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm
I'd say "yes," "no," and "of course not. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Preliminary matters. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:10 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Corp., 18 NY3d 499, 503 [2012]), the custodian engineer's generalized testimony that she would regularly test the door and determine that it was functioning safely and properly, by itself and without any expert analysis, failed to establish, prima facie, defendant's entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Lugo v Belmont Blvd. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Corp., 18 NY3d 499, 503 [2012]), the custodian engineer's generalized testimony that she would regularly test the door and determine that it was functioning safely and properly, by itself and without any expert analysis, failed to establish, prima facie, defendant's entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Lugo v Belmont Blvd. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 1:14 pm
Seems like you could just write it out.But as long as everyone know what you mean, it probably doesn't really matter much. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
§ 254(d) that would require federal Universal Service Fund contributions by ISPs: “[W]e believe that any decisions on whether and how to make BIAS providers contribute to USF funding are best addressed holistically in [] ongoing discussions of USF contribution reform, on a full record and with robust input from all interested parties, than in this proceeding. [read post]
